Running uphill : a comparative analysis of the gender gap in campaign financing

Tools

Sudulich, Laura and Trumm, Siim and Makropoulos, Iakovos (2024) Running uphill : a comparative analysis of the gender gap in campaign financing. European Journal of Political Research. ISSN 0304-4130 (https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12741)

[thumbnail of Sudulich-etal-EJPR-2024-a-comparative-analysis-of-the-gender-gap-in-campaign-financing]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Sudulich-etal-EJPR-2024-a-comparative-analysis-of-the-gender-gap-in-campaign-financing.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo
Download (347kB)| Preview

Abstract

Women are not a demographic minority, but they certainly are a minority in politics. Most legislative bodies across the world are still overwhelmingly male. Female candidates cite lack of resources as one of the main deterrents to run. Using data on candidates encompassing twenty-eight elections in sixteen countries between 2006 and 2017, we examine the role of electoral institutions, partisanship and candidates’ political profile in mitigating – or aggravating – the gender resource gap. We find that female candidates systematically avail of significantly lower campaign budgets. This is true across different electoral systems and on the left as well as on the right. The gap is larger in size among incumbents. It is also wider in parties that use voluntary quotas and put forward more female candidates. Moreover, the budget composition of male and female candidates varies considerably. Male candidates tend to use higher proportions of their own resources, while female candidates rely on proportionally higher party contributions, that are, however, smaller in size.

CORE (COnnecting REpositories)