Predictive data analytics in telecare and telehealth : systematic scoping review

Tools

Anderson, Euan and Lennon, Marilyn and Kavanagh, Kimberley and Weir, Natalie and Kernaghan, David and Roper, Marc and Dunlop, Emma and Lapp, Linda (2024) Predictive data analytics in telecare and telehealth : systematic scoping review. Online Journal of Public Health Informatics, 16. pp. 37-50. ISSN 1947-2579 (https://doi.org/10.2196/57618)

[thumbnail of Anderson-etal-JMIR-OJPHI-2024-Predictive-data-analytics-in-telecare-and-telehealth]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Anderson-etal-JMIR-OJPHI-2024-Predictive-data-analytics-in-telecare-and-telehealth.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo
Download (492kB)| Preview

Abstract

Background: Telecare and telehealth are important care-at-home services used to support individuals to live more independently at home. Historically, these technologies have reactively responded to issues. However, there has been a recent drive to make better use of the data from these services to facilitate more proactive and predictive care. Objective: This review seeks to explore the ways in which predictive data analytics techniques have been applied in telecare and telehealth in at-home settings. Methods: The PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist was adhered to alongside Arksey and O’Malley’s methodological framework. English language papers published in MEDLINE, Embase, and Social Science Premium Collection between 2012 and 2022 were considered and results were screened against inclusion or exclusion criteria. Results: In total, 86 papers were included in this review. The types of analytics featuring in this review can be categorized as anomaly detection (n=21), diagnosis (n=32), prediction (n=22), and activity recognition (n=11). The most common health conditions represented were Parkinson disease (n=12) and cardiovascular conditions (n=11). The main findings include: a lack of use of routinely collected data; a dominance of diagnostic tools; and barriers and opportunities that exist, such as including patient-reported outcomes, for future predictive analytics in telecare and telehealth. Conclusions: All papers in this review were small-scale pilots and, as such, future research should seek to apply these predictive techniques into larger trials. Additionally, further integration of routinely collected care data and patient-reported outcomes into predictive models in telecare and telehealth offer significant opportunities to improve the analytics being performed and should be explored further. Data sets used must be of suitable size and diversity, ensuring that models are generalizable to a wider population and can be appropriately trained, validated, and tested.

ORCID iDs

Anderson, Euan, Lennon, Marilyn ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3271-2400, Kavanagh, Kimberley ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2679-5409, Weir, Natalie ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1422-9415, Kernaghan, David ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0798-4885, Roper, Marc ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6794-4637, Dunlop, Emma ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0719-7614 and Lapp, Linda;
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)