Experimental and numerical study of wave-in-deck loads due to oblique transient wave groups

Wang, Hongchao and Santo, H. and Taylor, P.H. and Dai, S.S. and Chan, E.S. (2023) Experimental and numerical study of wave-in-deck loads due to oblique transient wave groups. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 120. 103914. ISSN 0889-9746 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2023.10391...)

[thumbnail of Wang-etal-JFS-2023-Experimental-and-numerical-study-of-wave-in-deck-loads] Text. Filename: Wang_etal_JFS_2023_Experimental_and_numerical_study_of_wave_in_deck_loads.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 7 June 2024.
License: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 logo

Download (32MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Wave-in-deck loads due to 45° oblique transient focus wave groups are investigated using model-scale experiments and computational fluid dynamics simulations with emphasis on comparing with head-on wave impacts for a solid cuboid deck model without and with an I-beam grillage beneath. After validation with experiments, numerical results are extended to consider wave-in-deck loads with 22.5° and 67.5° oblique wave directions. Generally, the head-on wave impacts cause larger longitudinal forces on the deck whereas the oblique cases result in larger downward vertical forces. For the deck with grillage case, Santo et al. (2020) and Wang et al. (2022) show that successive large spikes are observed in the force time series of head-on wave impact due to entrapped air-pocket effects in the grillage. However, here it is found that the large spikes are absent in the force time series for the oblique wave impacts and the patterns of forces are similar to the deck without grillage with rather small or no spikes in the force time series. Interrogation of the numerical flowfield reveals evidence that the asynchronous and less effective air entrapment in the grillage for the oblique cases are responsible for the difference. The maximum positive pressure on the underside of the deck is found to be much larger for the deck with grillage than without due to local slamming of jets formed in the grillage.