Evaluation and validation of Damage Assessment Tracking Criteria models within the sector of UK automotive remanufacturing

Tools

Harris, R.S. and Ijomah, W.L. and Windmill, J. (2023) Evaluation and validation of Damage Assessment Tracking Criteria models within the sector of UK automotive remanufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 414. 137494. ISSN 0959-6526 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137494)

[thumbnail of Harris-etal-JCP-2023-Evaluation-and-validation-of-Damage-Assessment-Tracking]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Harris_etal_JCP_2023_Evaluation_and_validation_of_Damage_Assessment_Tracking.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo
Download (1MB)| Preview

Abstract

This paper details the specific aims and purposes of the Damage Assessment Tracking Criteria; a series of evaluation tools designed to aid in remanufacturing inspection operations. The background and justification of this model, which is detailed in a separate work, identifies ill definition and an over reliance on opinion as barriers to effective inspection activities. Analysis of this issue led to the building of the Damage Assessment Tracking Criteria; a 4-model foundation that aims to provide a more comprehensive and more structured approach to the inspection stages of the typical remanufacturing process. Through expert opinion this model was evaluated multiple times. One review was used to gauge the level of idea communication within an academic situation, this was followed up by external industrial reviews of the model by those most likely to utilise it during industry practice. After extensive feedback and modification the final model assessment was carried out with an expert panel that were instructed to be as critical as possible with the model in order to ensure that its evaluation was as robust as possible. The results of these reviews were all on the positive side of the scale. Multiple statements regarding the potential value and suitability of each model aspect and justification for their use was presented in the format of an evaluation form which was used by those involved to present their findings and feedback. Negative feedback was addressed and successful modification yielding more positive results in the next evaluation was achieved. Though walking the line between specificity and generic was noted to be the most difficult factor to consider when developing the models, the final findings of the evaluation show that significant value was perceived by those operating within industry. The potential benefits of customised variants of the models is acknowledged by all parties as a possible future avenue of research.

ORCID iDs

Harris, R.S., Ijomah, W.L. and Windmill, J. ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4878-349X;
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)