Referendum debate riposte
Coutts, Garry (2014) Referendum debate riposte. Scottish Journal of Residential Child Care, 13 (2). ISSN 1478-1840
Preview |
Text.
Filename: Coutts_SJRCC_2014_Referendum_debate_riposte.pdf
Final Published Version License: Strathprints license 1.0 Download (104kB)| Preview |
Abstract
Mark Smith’s case for independence boils down to:• there is a distinct Scottish approach to social welfare• our ability to pursue this approach is compromised by Westminster• the devolution settlement (and anything short of full independence) will not allow this tradition to flourishPlacing the current debate in the context of policy development since the Reformation is an interesting approach. It certainly allows the author a wealth of material from which to pick examples. However, I query whether the historical record actually shows there is such a distinct cultural difference in social welfare policy as implied.
Persistent Identifier
https://doi.org/10.17868/strath.00084962-
-
Item type: Article ID code: 84962 Dates: DateEvent30 September 2014PublishedSubjects: Social Sciences > Social Sciences (General) Department: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences (HaSS) > Social Work and Social Policy > Centre for Excellence for Children's Care and Protection (CELCIS) Depositing user: Pure Administrator Date deposited: 30 Mar 2023 15:15 Last modified: 11 Nov 2024 13:53 Related URLs: URI: https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/84962