Numerical study on the influence of porous baffle interface and mesh typology on the silencer flow analysis

Kyaw Oo D’Amore, Giada and Morgut, Mitja and Biot, Marco and Mauro, Francesco (2022) Numerical study on the influence of porous baffle interface and mesh typology on the silencer flow analysis. Marine Systems & Ocean Technology, 17 (2). pp. 71-79. ISSN 2199-4749 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s40868-022-00114-1)

[thumbnail of DAmore-etal-MSOT-2022-Numerical-study-on-the-influence-of-porous]
Preview
Text. Filename: DAmore_etal_MSOT_2022_Numerical_study_on_the_influence_of_porous.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo

Download (1MB)| Preview

Abstract

The study of the internal component geometries (i.e. perforated elements) is relevant for the acoustic performance optimisation of a silencer. During the design phase, the evaluation of the properties of a silencer is performed by numerical analysis. In the literature, there is a lack of general guidelines and comparisons among different modelling strategies. So, in this study, the influence of grid type (i.e. trimmed vs tetrahedral) on the numerical prediction of the flow inside a reactive silencer is analysed. Moreover, using a porous baffle interface to model the perforated pipe is investigated, searching for a faster and easier way to model perforated elements. The simulations are carried out with the commercial CFD software STAR-CCM+. The comparison of the obtained axial velocity with a literature case study assesses the numerical model reliability. The analysis highlights that velocity and pressure predicted with both the mesh typologies does not significantly differ, but the trimmed mesh allows to save cells number, reducing the computational cost. Instead, obtain a reliable flow description using the porous baffle interface is strictly correlated to the settings of the resistance coefficient. This assumption does not provide accurate results for the analysed perforated pipe. On the other hand, using a simplified model allows to easily perform a comparison between different muffler geometries, as the holes have not to be drowned and meshed after each modification.