Does modernizing union administrative practices promote or hinder union revitalization? A comparative study of US, UK and Australian unions

Clark, Paul F. and Bamber, Greg J. and Whitehead, Paul V. and Gray, Lois S. and Cockfield, Sandra and Gilbert, Kay (2021) Does modernizing union administrative practices promote or hinder union revitalization? A comparative study of US, UK and Australian unions. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 59 (2). pp. 370-397. ISSN 0007-1080 (https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12526)

[thumbnail of Clark-etal-BJIR-2020-Does-modernizing-union-administrative-practices]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Clark_etal_BJIR_2020_Does_modernizing_union_administrative_practices.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo
Download (282kB)| Preview

Abstract

Can a union be both democratic and administratively efficient, or are these goals always at odds? Building on the Webbs’ focus on this critical question, this article analyses and compares the changing administrative policies and practices of US, UK and Australian trade unions over a 25-year period. We conducted surveys of unions in all three countries to gather information on union policies and practices involving the unions’ human resources, hiring, budgeting and strategic planning. Using these novel longitudinal data, we contribute to industrial relations scholarship by showing that unions have increasingly adopted formal, systematic practices in these areas. The article is grounded in theory and also has practical relevance given the important implications that our findings may have for the revitalization of unions in the three countries and beyond.

ORCID iDs

Clark, Paul F., Bamber, Greg J., Whitehead, Paul V., Gray, Lois S., Cockfield, Sandra and Gilbert, Kay ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6235-6884;
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)