Pectus patient information website has improved access to care and patient reported outcomes

Tikka, Theofano and Webb, Joanne and Agostini, Paula and Kerr, Amy and Mannion, Glenn and Steyn, Richard S and Bishay, Ehab and Kalkat, Maninder S and Rajesh, Pala B and Naidu, Babu (2016) Pectus patient information website has improved access to care and patient reported outcomes. Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, 11 (1). ISSN 1749-8090

[img]
Preview
Text (Tikka-etal-JCS-2016-Pectus-patient-information-website-has-improved-access-to-care)
Tikka_etal_JCS_2016_Pectus_patient_information_website_has_improved_access_to_care.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo

Download (560kB)| Preview

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND: Pectus is the most common congenital disorder. Awareness amongst primary care physicians and the general public is poor. NHS commissioning bodies plan to withdraw funding for this surgery because they deem a lack of sufficient evidence of benefit. The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of introducing a patient information website on referral and activity patterns and on patients reported outcomes. METHODS: We produced an innovative information website, www.pectus.co.uk , accessible to the general public, providing information about pectus deformities; management options and advice about surgery. Referral patterns and number of cases where studied before and after the introduction of the website in 2010. Patients' satisfaction post-op was assessed using the Brompton's single step questionnaire (SSQ). RESULTS: The website had considerable traffic with 2179 hits in 2012, 4983 in 2013 and 7416 in 2014. This has led to 1421 contacts and 372 email enquiries. These emails have resulted in an increased number of patients who have been assessed and go on to have surgery. We asked 59 pectus excavatum patients who were operated from 2008 to 2014 to complete the SSQ. We received 32 replies. Eighty-four percent (16/19) of patients who visited the website and then underwent surgery, found the website useful. All patients scored satisfactorily in SSQ. Even though those who visited the website tended to be more satisfied with the surgical outcomes this did not reach statistical significance. This group of patients said that would have the operation again given the option compared to 76.9 % of the group who did not visit the website before surgery (p=0.031). Despite the fact that patients who visited the website experienced more post-operative complications were equally or more satisfied with post-operative outcomes. The overall SSQ obtainable score was not different for the two subgroups, being more widespread in the group that did not visit the website. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of a pectus patient information website has significantly improved access to specialised services. Patients are overall highly satisfied with the surgical outcomes.