Picture of boy being examining by doctor at a tuberculosis sanatorium

Understanding our future through Open Access research about our past...

Strathprints makes available scholarly Open Access content by researchers in the Centre for the Social History of Health & Healthcare (CSHHH), based within the School of Humanities, and considered Scotland's leading centre for the history of health and medicine.

Research at CSHHH explores the modern world since 1800 in locations as diverse as the UK, Asia, Africa, North America, and Europe. Areas of specialism include contraception and sexuality; family health and medical services; occupational health and medicine; disability; the history of psychiatry; conflict and warfare; and, drugs, pharmaceuticals and intoxicants.

Explore the Open Access research of the Centre for the Social History of Health and Healthcare. Or explore all of Strathclyde's Open Access research...

Image: Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust. Wellcome Collection - CC-BY.

Making scenario interventions matter : exploring issues of power and rationality

Cairns, George and Wright, George (2018) Making scenario interventions matter : exploring issues of power and rationality. Futures & Foresight Science. ISSN 2573-5152 (In Press)

[img] Text (Cairns-Wright-FFS-2018-Making-scenario-interventions-matter-exploring-issues)
Cairns_Wright_FFS_2018_Making_scenario_interventions_matter_exploring_issues.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 26 November 2019.

Download (381kB) | Request a copy from the Strathclyde author

Abstract

In this article, we consider prospects for long-term impact from scenario projects, specifically for sustained positive change. We outline scenario methods intended to actively engage scenario development team members who will be directly impacted by the ‘focal issue’ of the scenario exercise, in particular those who are remote and by and large excluded from the central decision making processes of the powerful. We consider possibilities for building capacity for them to envisage and enact alternative futures for themselves and their communities. However, we see a need to consider how current powerful actors might respond to the wishes and actions of less powerful stakeholders, positing that the potential for action by these less powerful groups may be disrupted by the rationality of the more powerful, where any intended action is against the latter’s interests. We argue that understanding and appreciating issues of power and rationality are central to how such participatory approaches might elicit coordinated and articulated action in response to positive scenarios. We discuss this issue by reference to contemporary interpretations of Aristotelian phronēsis, or ‘practical wisdom’. We outline steps involved in enacting an augmented scenario model that responds to this critique.