Picture of boy being examining by doctor at a tuberculosis sanatorium

Understanding our future through Open Access research about our past...

Strathprints makes available scholarly Open Access content by researchers in the Centre for the Social History of Health & Healthcare (CSHHH), based within the School of Humanities, and considered Scotland's leading centre for the history of health and medicine.

Research at CSHHH explores the modern world since 1800 in locations as diverse as the UK, Asia, Africa, North America, and Europe. Areas of specialism include contraception and sexuality; family health and medical services; occupational health and medicine; disability; the history of psychiatry; conflict and warfare; and, drugs, pharmaceuticals and intoxicants.

Explore the Open Access research of the Centre for the Social History of Health and Healthcare. Or explore all of Strathclyde's Open Access research...

Image: Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust. Wellcome Collection - CC-BY.

The underpinnings of intuition

Dörfler, Viktor and Stierand, Marc (2017) The underpinnings of intuition. In: Intuition, Trust, and Analytics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. ISBN 9781351764407

[img] Text (Dorfler-Stierand-CRC-2017-The-underpinnings-of-intuition)
Dorfler_Stierand_CRC_2017_The_underpinnings_of_intuition.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 26 April 2019.

Download (662kB) | Request a copy from the Strathclyde author

Abstract

Understanding intuition puzzled many researchers. Only philosophers were feeling comfortable to think about intuition not only as a legitimate but also as a possibly superior form of knowledge (see e.g. Bergson, 1911, 1946; Jung, 1921: §770; Spinoza, 1677: Part 5). It was thus during this early stage of intuition research, that philosophy provided the basis for one of the most fundamental claims in the human studies: if we were to fully understand human consciousness, we must also understand intuition. In fact, as David Chalmers (1998: 110) argues, intuition is ‘the very raison d’être’ why we know so little about human consciousness. Thus, psychologists started to develop the so called ‘dual process theories’ that later also found recognition within management and organization research. Although intuition has thus found its way into mainstream research, we cannot say that we have a widespread agreement about some fundamentals of intuition, i.e. whether it can be ultimately reduced to firings of neurons, should it be regarded as a complex mental phenomenon, or whether we should regard it as something mystical. Of course, in this intuition is not fundamentally different from other mental phenomena, only due to its peculiar characteristics discussed below, the possibility of looking at it in different lights is more apparent. However, we believe that this lack of agreement will not prevent scholarly attempts to understand intuition better. And, for now at least, researchers with very different 2 beliefs seem to be able to build on one another’s results and work together in the joint endeavor to catch the essence of this particularly interesting and beautiful mental phenomenon.