Picture of blood cells

Open Access research which pushes advances in bionanotechnology

Strathprints makes available scholarly Open Access content by researchers in the Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy & Biomedical Sciences (SIPBS) , based within the Faculty of Science.

SIPBS is a major research centre in Scotland focusing on 'new medicines', 'better medicines' and 'better use of medicines'. This includes the exploration of nanoparticles and nanomedicines within the wider research agenda of bionanotechnology, in which the tools of nanotechnology are applied to solve biological problems. At SIPBS multidisciplinary approaches are also pursued to improve bioscience understanding of novel therapeutic targets with the aim of developing therapeutic interventions and the investigation, development and manufacture of drug substances and products.

Explore the Open Access research of SIPBS. Or explore all of Strathclyde's Open Access research...

Getting tough with the dragon? The comparative correlates of foreign policy attitudes toward China in the United States and UK

Scotto, Thomas J. and Reifler, Jason (2017) Getting tough with the dragon? The comparative correlates of foreign policy attitudes toward China in the United States and UK. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 17 (2). pp. 265-299. ISSN 1470-4838

[img]
Preview
Text (Scotto-Reifler-IRAP-2017-comparative-correlates-of-foreign-policy-attitudes-toward-China)
Scotto_Reifler_IRAP_2017_comparative_correlates_of_foreign_policy_attitudes_toward_China.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo

Download (285kB)| Preview

    Abstract

    A large body of research suggests mass publics are capable of thinking coherently about international relations. We extend this body of research to show that domain relevant postures - in our case, more abstract beliefs about foreign policy - are related to how tough of a line representative samples of US and UK respondents want their governments to take toward China. More specifically, we utilize a unique comparative survey of American and British foreign policy attitudes to show broad support for toughness toward China. Beliefs about the use of the military and attitudes regarding globalization help explain preferences for tough economic and military policies toward China. In the two countries, the relationship between general foreign policy outlooks and the positions citizens take is robust to the addition of a general mediator that controls for the general affect those surveyed have toward China. Finally, the strength of the relationship between these abstract postures and specific preferences for a China policy are different across the countries.