Picture of UK Houses of Parliament

Leading national thinking on politics, government & public policy through Open Access research

Strathprints makes available scholarly Open Access content by researchers in the School of Government & Public Policy, based within the Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences.

Research here is 1st in Scotland for research intensity and spans a wide range of domains. The Department of Politics demonstrates expertise in understanding parties, elections and public opinion, with additional emphases on political economy, institutions and international relations. This international angle is reflected in the European Policies Research Centre (EPRC) which conducts comparative research on public policy. Meanwhile, the Centre for Energy Policy provides independent expertise on energy, working across multidisciplinary groups to shape policy for a low carbon economy.

Explore the Open Access research of the School of Government & Public Policy. Or explore all of Strathclyde's Open Access research...

A qualitative exploration of participants’ experiences of taking part in a walking programme : perceived benefits, barriers, choices and use of intervention resources

Mitchell, Fiona (2016) A qualitative exploration of participants’ experiences of taking part in a walking programme : perceived benefits, barriers, choices and use of intervention resources. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities. ISSN 1360-2322

[img]
Preview
Text (Mitchell-JARID2016-qualitative-exploration-of-participants-experiences-of-taking-part-in-a-walking-programme)
Mitchell_JARID2016_qualitative_exploration_of_participants_experiences_of_taking_part_in_a_walking_programme.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript

Download (755kB)| Preview

    Abstract

    Background: Adults with Intellectual Disabilities (ID) experience significant inequalities and tend to be more sedentary and less physically active than the wider population. Walking programmes are an effective way to increase physical activity (PA) but have not been used in studies involving adults with ID. Method: 19 adults with ID participated in semi-structured interviews or focus groups exploring their experiences of taking part in a walking programme (Walk Well). Data were coded using thematic analysis. Results: Four overarching themes emerged: perceived benefits of taking part in the programme, perceived drawbacks/ barriers, walking choices and using the Walk Well resources. Whilst there was not a significant increase in walking for all, the participants reported positive experiences of taking part in the programme. Self-monitoring proved difficult for some, particularly reading the daily step-count recorded on the pedometer and writing it in the diary. Carers also played an important role in facilitating and preventing behaviour change in adults with ID. Conclusion: Additional barriers prevent many adults with ID from participating in PA. Capturing participant experiences provides important information for designing effective and equitable health improvement programmes.