Picture map of Europe with pins indicating European capital cities

Open Access research with a European policy impact...

The Strathprints institutional repository is a digital archive of University of Strathclyde's Open Access research outputs. Strathprints provides access to thousands of Open Access research papers by Strathclyde researchers, including by researchers from the European Policies Research Centre (EPRC).

EPRC is a leading institute in Europe for comparative research on public policy, with a particular focus on regional development policies. Spanning 30 European countries, EPRC research programmes have a strong emphasis on applied research and knowledge exchange, including the provision of policy advice to EU institutions and national and sub-national government authorities throughout Europe.

Explore research outputs by the European Policies Research Centre...

A qualitative exploration of participants’ experiences of taking part in a walking programme : perceived benefits, barriers, choices and use of intervention resources

Mitchell, Fiona (2016) A qualitative exploration of participants’ experiences of taking part in a walking programme : perceived benefits, barriers, choices and use of intervention resources. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities. ISSN 1360-2322

[img] Text (Mitchell-JARID2016-qualitative-exploration-of-participants-experiences-of-taking-part-in-a-walking-programme)
Mitchell_JARID2016_qualitative_exploration_of_participants_experiences_of_taking_part_in_a_walking_programme.pdf - Accepted Author Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 23 November 2018.

Download (755kB) | Request a copy from the Strathclyde author

Abstract

Background: Adults with Intellectual Disabilities (ID) experience significant inequalities and tend to be more sedentary and less physically active than the wider population. Walking programmes are an effective way to increase physical activity (PA) but have not been used in studies involving adults with ID. Method: 19 adults with ID participated in semi-structured interviews or focus groups exploring their experiences of taking part in a walking programme (Walk Well). Data were coded using thematic analysis. Results: Four overarching themes emerged: perceived benefits of taking part in the programme, perceived drawbacks/ barriers, walking choices and using the Walk Well resources. Whilst there was not a significant increase in walking for all, the participants reported positive experiences of taking part in the programme. Self-monitoring proved difficult for some, particularly reading the daily step-count recorded on the pedometer and writing it in the diary. Carers also played an important role in facilitating and preventing behaviour change in adults with ID. Conclusion: Additional barriers prevent many adults with ID from participating in PA. Capturing participant experiences provides important information for designing effective and equitable health improvement programmes.