The new ambitions for 2014-2020 European structural and investment funds evaluation : pouring water in a leaking container?

Polverari, Laura (2016) The new ambitions for 2014-2020 European structural and investment funds evaluation : pouring water in a leaking container? European Structural and Investment Funds Journal, 4 (2). pp. 59-67. ISSN 2196-8268

[thumbnail of Polverari-ESIFJ-2016-The-new-ambitions-for-2014-2020-european-structural-and-investment-funds]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Polverari_ESIFJ_2016_The_new_ambitions_for_2014_2020_european_structural_and_investment_funds.pdf
Final Published Version
Download (177kB)| Preview

Abstract

One of the recurring criticisms that have been levied to EU Cohesion policy has been its inability to prove its effectiveness and value for money. These criticisms, and the parallel growing pressures to reduce the resources assigned to the policy in recent rounds of budget negotiations, have led to the introduction of changes in the regulatory obligations attached to funding. In the 2014-2020 regulations, efforts to improve the policy’s effectiveness have primarily related to a set of new obligations intended to improve the results-orientation of programme design and implementation, and to a strengthening of the purposefulness of evaluation activities, including through a shift from evaluating implementation to appraising impacts. This article focuses on the latter theme. It reviews the main evaluation obligations foreseen by the Common Provisions Regulations (CPR) and the change in evaluation focus advocated by DG REGIO, the preparation of Evaluation Plans in selected EU programmes and these plans’ coverage, focus, objectives and resources. The article concludes with some reflections on the challenges that the new regulatory framework entails for managing authorities. It argues that the new CPR and Commission guidance notes are addressing past weaknesses by adding new demands to old ones without having sufficiently addressed the problems behind the partly ineffectual responses to already existing requirements, and calls for a stock-taking exercise in order to appreciate what is working, what is not working and what is needed to make evaluation a real programme management and accountability tool.

ORCID iDs

Polverari, Laura ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2242-6320;
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)