Review and application of Rainflow residue processing techniques for accurate fatigue damage estimation

Tools

Marsh, Gabriel and Wignall, Colin and Thies, Philipp R. and Barltrop, Nigel and Incecik, Atilla and Venugopal, Vengatesan and Johanning, Lars (2016) Review and application of Rainflow residue processing techniques for accurate fatigue damage estimation. International Journal of Fatigue, 82 (Part 3). pp. 757-765. ISSN 0142-1123 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.10.007)

[thumbnail of Marsh-etal-IJF2016-Rainflow-residue-processing-techniques-for-accurate-fatigue-damage]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Marsh_etal_IJF2016_Rainflow_residue_processing_techniques_for_accurate_fatigue_damage.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo
Download (1MB)| Preview

Abstract

Most fatigue loaded structural components are subjected to variable amplitude loads which must be processed into a form that is compatible with design life calculations. Rainflow counting allows individual stress cycles to be identified where they form a closed stress-strain hysteresis loop within a random signal, but inevitably leaves a residue of open data points which must be post-processed. Comparison is made between conventional methods of processing the residue data points, which may be non-conservative, and a more versatile method, presented by Amzallag et al. (1994), which allows transition cycles to be processed accurately. This paper presents an analytical proof of the method presented by Amzallag et al. The impact of residue processing on fatigue calculations is demonstrated through the application and comparison of the different techniques in two case studies using long term, high resolution data sets. The most significance is found when the load process results in a slowly varying mean stress which is not fully accounted for by traditional Rainflow counting methods.

CORE (COnnecting REpositories)