Comparisons among the five ground-motion models developed using RESORCE for the prediction of response spectral accelerations due to earthquakes in Europe and the Middle East

Tools

Douglas, John and Akkar, Sinan and Ameri, Gabriele and Bard, Pierre Yves and Bindi, Dino and Bommer, Julian J. and Bora, Sanjay Singh and Cotton, Fabrice and Derras, Boumédiène and Hermkes, Marcel and Kuehn, Nicolas Martin and Luzi, Lucia and Massa, Marco and Pacor, Francesca and Riggelsen, Carsten and Sandikkaya, M. Abdullah and Scherbaum, Frank and Stafford, Peter J. and Traversa, Paola (2014) Comparisons among the five ground-motion models developed using RESORCE for the prediction of response spectral accelerations due to earthquakes in Europe and the Middle East. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 12 (1). pp. 341-358. ISSN 1573-1456 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9522-8)

[thumbnail of Douglas-etal-BEA2014-comparisons-five-ground-motion-models-resorce-earthquakes.pdf]
Preview
 Text. Filename: douglasetal2014bee.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript
License: Unspecified
Download (1MB)| Preview

Abstract

This article presents comparisons among the five ground-motion models described in other articles within this special issue, in terms of data selection criteria, characteristics of the models and predicted peak ground and response spectral accelerations. Comparisons are also made with predictions from the Next Generation Attenuation (NGA) models to which the models presented here have similarities (e.g. a common master database has been used) but also differences (e.g. some models in this issue are nonparametric). As a result of the differing data selection criteria and derivation techniques the predicted median ground motions show considerable differences (up to a factor of two for certain scenarios), particularly for magnitudes and distances close to or beyond the range of the available observations. The predicted influence of style-of-faulting shows much variation among models whereas site amplification factors are more similar, with peak amplification at around 1s. These differences are greater than those among predictions from the NGA models. The models for aleatory variability (sigma), however, are similar and suggest that ground-motion variability from this region is slightly higher than that predicted by the NGA models, based primarily on data from California and Taiwan.

ORCID iDs

Douglas, John ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3822-0060, Akkar, Sinan, Ameri, Gabriele, Bard, Pierre Yves, Bindi, Dino, Bommer, Julian J., Bora, Sanjay Singh, Cotton, Fabrice, Derras, Boumédiène, Hermkes, Marcel, Kuehn, Nicolas Martin, Luzi, Lucia, Massa, Marco, Pacor, Francesca, Riggelsen, Carsten, Sandikkaya, M. Abdullah, Scherbaum, Frank, Stafford, Peter J. and Traversa, Paola;
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)