Picture of DNA strand

Pioneering chemical biology & medicinal chemistry through Open Access research...

Strathprints makes available scholarly Open Access content by researchers in the Department of Pure & Applied Chemistry, based within the Faculty of Science.

Research here spans a wide range of topics from analytical chemistry to materials science, and from biological chemistry to theoretical chemistry. The specific work in chemical biology and medicinal chemistry, as an example, encompasses pioneering techniques in synthesis, bioinformatics, nucleic acid chemistry, amino acid chemistry, heterocyclic chemistry, biophysical chemistry and NMR spectroscopy.

Explore the Open Access research of the Department of Pure & Applied Chemistry. Or explore all of Strathclyde's Open Access research...

The compensational boundary method to calculate the projected contact area of nanoindentation in atomistic simulations

Xu, Zhenhai and Zhao, Yihui and Yuan, Lin and Qin, Yi and Chen, Mingjun and Shan, Debin (2016) The compensational boundary method to calculate the projected contact area of nanoindentation in atomistic simulations. Computational Materials Science, 112 (A). 185–192. ISSN 0927-0256

[img]
Preview
Text (Xu-etal-CMS-2015-The-compensational-boundary-method-to-calculate-the-projected-contact-area-of-nanoindentation)
Xu_etal_CMS_2015_The_compensational_boundary_method_to_calculate_the_projected_contact_area_of_nanoindentation.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript
License: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 logo

Download (1MB)| Preview

    Abstract

    The atomistic simulation of nanoidentation has become a powerful method to probe the mechanical behaviour and properties of small volumes of materials. It is crucial to calculate the projected contact area (PCA) accurately in order to obtain a reliable value of nanoindentation hardness. In this work, atomistic simulations of nanoindentation were performed on the Cu(111) and Ag(111) surfaces, and a new compensational boundary method is proposed to calculate the PCA. Compared with other available methods, this method provides a clear physical implication, and works well independently of the contact depth and the deformation behaviour of the material. It is also concluded that the widely-used experimental Oliver–Pharr (O–P) method significantly underestimates the PCA in atomistic simulations, and does not work for shallow nanoindentation at the nanoscale.