Picture of DNA strand

Pioneering chemical biology & medicinal chemistry through Open Access research...

Strathprints makes available scholarly Open Access content by researchers in the Department of Pure & Applied Chemistry, based within the Faculty of Science.

Research here spans a wide range of topics from analytical chemistry to materials science, and from biological chemistry to theoretical chemistry. The specific work in chemical biology and medicinal chemistry, as an example, encompasses pioneering techniques in synthesis, bioinformatics, nucleic acid chemistry, amino acid chemistry, heterocyclic chemistry, biophysical chemistry and NMR spectroscopy.

Explore the Open Access research of the Department of Pure & Applied Chemistry. Or explore all of Strathclyde's Open Access research...

Limits on the potential accuracy of earthquake risk evaluations using the L’aquila (Italy) earthquake as an example

Douglas, John and Climent, Daniel Monfort and Negulescu, Caterina and Roullé, Agathe and Sedan, Olivier (2015) Limits on the potential accuracy of earthquake risk evaluations using the L’aquila (Italy) earthquake as an example. Annals of Geophysics, 58 (2). ISSN 1593-5213

[img]
Preview
Text (Douglas-etal-AOG-2015-Limits-on-the-potential-accuracy-of-earthquake-risk-evaluations-using-the)
Douglas_etal_AOG_2015_Limits_on_the_potential_accuracy_of_earthquake_risk_evaluations_using_the.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo

Download (5MB) | Preview

Abstract

This article is concerned with attempting to ‘predict’ (hindcast) the damage caused by the L’Aquila 2009 earthquake (M<inf>w</inf> 6.3) and, more generally, with the question of how close predicted damage can ever be to observations. Damage is hindcast using a well-established empiricalbased approach based on vulnerability indices and macroseismic intensities, adjusted for local site effects. Using information that was available before the earthquake and assuming the same event characteristics as the L’Aquila mainshock, the overall damage is reasonably well predicted but there are considerable differences in the damage pattern. To understand the reasons for these differences, information that was only available after the event were include within the calculation. Despite some improvement in the predicted damage, in particularly by the modification of the vulnerability indices and the parameter influencing the width of the damage distribution, these hindcasts do not match all the details of the observations. This is because of local effects: both in terms of the ground shaking, which is only detectable by the installation of a much denser strong-motion network and a detailed microzonation, and in terms of the building vulnerability, which cannot be modeled using a statistical approach but would require detailed analytical modeling for which calibration data are likely to be lacking. Future studies should concentrate on adjusting the generic components of the approach to make them more applicable to their location of interest. To increase the number of observations available to make these adjustments, we encourage the collection of damage states (and not just habitability classes) following earthquakes and also the installation of dense strongmotion networks in built-up areas.