Online discussion and the 2014 Scottish independence referendum : flaming keyboards or forums of deliberation?

Tools

Quinlan, Stephen and Shephard, Mark and Paterson, Lindsay (2015) Online discussion and the 2014 Scottish independence referendum : flaming keyboards or forums of deliberation? Electoral Studies, 38. 192–205. ISSN 0261-3794 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2015.02.009)

[thumbnail of Quinlan-etal-ES-2015-Online-discussion-and-the-2014-Scottish-independence-referendum]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Quinlan_etal_ES_2015_Online_discussion_and_the_2014_Scottish_independence_referendum.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript
License: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 logo
Download (1MB)| Preview

Abstract

Referendums often fail to live up to a deliberative standard, with many characterised by low levels of knowledge, disinterest and misinformation, negativity, and a focus on extraneous issues to which voters are voting. But social media offers new avenues for referendums to incorporate a greater deliberative dimension. Through a content analysis of BBC discussion forums, we test whether online discussion of the Scottish independence referendum has deliberative characteristics. Results suggest a mixed picture with conversation displaying some deliberative features (low incidences of flaming/discussion of referendum issues). However, low levels of discussion intensity, dominance by a few, little knowledge exchange, and high gender inequality illustrate that online referendum discussion lacks deliberative characteristics, implying that social media are not a panacea for referendum deliberation.

ORCID iDs

Quinlan, Stephen, Shephard, Mark ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5350-4734 and Paterson, Lindsay;
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)