Picture water droplets

Developing mathematical theories of the physical world: Open Access research on fluid dynamics from Strathclyde

Strathprints makes available Open Access scholarly outputs by Strathclyde's Department of Mathematics & Statistics, where continuum mechanics and industrial mathematics is a specialism. Such research seeks to understand fluid dynamics, among many other related areas such as liquid crystals and droplet evaporation.

The Department of Mathematics & Statistics also demonstrates expertise in population modelling & epidemiology, stochastic analysis, applied analysis and scientific computing. Access world leading mathematical and statistical Open Access research!

Explore all Strathclyde Open Access research...

What are we producing knowledge for?

Orme, J. (2006) What are we producing knowledge for? Journal of Social Policy and Social Work, 2. pp. 196-208.

[img] Microsoft Word
orme_144299_en.doc

Download (120kB)

Abstract

This paper explores the imperatives for undertaking research for the purposes of knowledge production in social work. This is particularly important in an era where we are producing more and more information, but this does not necessarily contribute to knowledge and understanding, but is often driven by other agendas. In this context of increasing information it is apparent that there has been little or no strategic direction for this to contribute to knowledge production. Such assertions suggest a distinction between knowledge and information. They also beg the question of whether there should be ‘strategic direction’ or whether knowledge should be produced for the sake of knowing. The paper draws on theories of knowledge to explore knowledge production in and for social work. Drawing on Foucault’s premise that knowledge is produced out of antagonism it suggests that there are a number of competing imperatives for producing knowledge, or more accurately, undertaking research, producing evidence and/or information. These are deliberately polarised as negative and positive imperatives to explore the phenomena of knowledge production. Of course these polarizations are false dichotomies, but drawing on Foucault’s archaeological approach it could be argued that rearranging disparate elements of knowledge production may give different perspectives of knowledge production (Chambon, 1999).