Reappraising the nature of the firm: the role and influence of lexical and structural ambiguity

Kay, Neil (2008) Reappraising the nature of the firm: the role and influence of lexical and structural ambiguity. Organization Studies, 29 (8-9). pp. 1209-1226. ISSN 0170-8406 (https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840608094777)

Full text not available in this repository.Request a copy

Abstract

In this paper it is argued that lexical ambiguity (where a word can have two or more separate meanings) and structural ambiguity (where a phrase can have two or more separate meanings) have profoundly affected the development of the theory of the firm and the economics of organization. We focus particularly on Coase's agenda as to what constitutes the nature of the firm, and argue that intellectual resources have been misallocated in this field of inquiry because of endemic problems of lexical and structural ambiguity. We suggest how the agenda could be restated and redirected. It is concluded that resource-based economics, organizational decision theory and transaction cost analysis (in the broadest sense) should not be seen as potentially competing perspectives or frameworks in analysis of the nature of the firm, but instead as valuable and complementary tools for such analysis.

  • Item type:Article
    ID code:19970
    Dates:
    Date
    Event
    1 August 2008
    Published
    Keywords:coase, firm, ambiguity, transactions, organization, Demsetz, Economic Theory, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management, Management of Technology and Innovation
    Subjects:Social Sciences > Economic Theory
    Department:Strathclyde Business School > Economics
    Depositing user: Strathprints Administrator
    Date deposited:28 May 2010 14:24
    Last modified:20 Jan 2021 18:35
    URI:https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/19970
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)