Reading the Geneva Bible : notes toward an English revolution?

Tools

Furniss, Tom (2009) Reading the Geneva Bible : notes toward an English revolution? Prose Studies, 31 (1). pp. 1-21. ISSN 0144-0357 (https://doi.org/10.1080/01440350903156995)

[thumbnail of strathprints018607]
Preview
 Text. Filename: strathprints018607.pdf
Preprint
Download (583kB)| Preview

Abstract

Since its first publication in 1560, the Geneva Bible has been considered by many as a revolutionary or seditious text, especially because of the numerous explanatory notes that the translators added in the margins of the text. Focusing on the 1560 Old Testament, this article takes a fresh look at the text, marginal notes and editorial apparatus of the Geneva Bible in order to ask whether they can be read as recommending English readers to overthrow Mary Tudor as an idolatrous tyrant and whether they could be read as giving support to the revolution against Charles I almost a century later. A close reading of the Geneva Old Testament leads to the conclusion that its politics are undecidable because the notes and prefaces faithfully reflect the internal political undecidability of the Bible itself. While some of the Geneva notes and prefaces encourage a revolutionary response to tyrants, there are many others that recommend obedience or passive resistance. As a consequence, the Geneva Bible's marginal notes could only be used to legitimize revolution through radically reductive reading strategies.

ORCID iDs

Furniss, Tom ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9832-940X;
  • Item type:Article
    ID code:18607
    Dates:
    Date
    Event
    April 2009
    Published
    Notes:This article continues my exploration of the textuality of key radical writings, which has hitherto focussed on the works of Tom Paine and Mary Wollstonecraft. It takes a fresh look at the assumption that the Geneva Bible was a radical text. A close reading of the marginal notes and textual apparatus of the Geneva Old Testament leads to the conclusion that its politics are undecidable because the notes and prefaces faithfully reflect the internal political undecidability of the Bible itself. While some of the Geneva notes and prefaces encourage a revolutionary response to tyrants, there are many others that recommend obedience or passive resistance.
    Subjects:Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > The Bible
    Language and Literature > English literature
    Department:Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences (HaSS) > Humanities > English
    Depositing user: Mrs Tereza McLaughlin-Vanova
    Date deposited:19 Apr 2010 14:52
    Last modified:12 Dec 2024 02:26
    Related URLs:
    URI:https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/18607
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)