Picture map of Europe with pins indicating European capital cities

Open Access research with a European policy impact...

The Strathprints institutional repository is a digital archive of University of Strathclyde's Open Access research outputs. Strathprints provides access to thousands of Open Access research papers by Strathclyde researchers, including by researchers from the European Policies Research Centre (EPRC).

EPRC is a leading institute in Europe for comparative research on public policy, with a particular focus on regional development policies. Spanning 30 European countries, EPRC research programmes have a strong emphasis on applied research and knowledge exchange, including the provision of policy advice to EU institutions and national and sub-national government authorities throughout Europe.

Explore research outputs by the European Policies Research Centre...

Barriers to process learning: authority and anomie in regional clusters

Hibbert, P. and Huxham, C. and Sydow, J. and Lerch, G. (2010) Barriers to process learning: authority and anomie in regional clusters. Management Learning, 41 (4). pp. 453-471. ISSN 1350-5076

Full text not available in this repository. Request a copy from the Strathclyde author

Abstract

In this paper we consider the nature and implications of barriers to collaborative process learning that may occur in regional clusters. Our approach is rooted in research and interorganizational collaboration and focuses on interview-based research in photonics clusters in: Scotland and the West Midlands in the United Kingdom; Berlin-Brandenburg in Germany; and Arizona in the United States of America. From this research we develop characterizations of the barriers to collaborative process learning in clusters at three levels of analysis - the macro, micro and meso levels. We also develop an integrated conceptualization of these barriers, which reveals a difficult tension between 'authority' and 'anomie'. This tension has implications for the management of process learning, but also connects with recent debate about whether learning is most helpfully understood as an individual or collective process.