Exploring factors for prescription and validation of actuated upper limb devices : a cross-sectional survey of allied health professionals

Tools

Galbert, Angel and Buis, Arjan (2024) Exploring factors for prescription and validation of actuated upper limb devices : a cross-sectional survey of allied health professionals. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal, 7 (1). 4. ISSN 2561-987X (https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v7i1.43790)

[thumbnail of Galbert-Buis-CPOJ-2024-Exploring-factors-for-prescription-and-validation-of-actuated-upper-limb-devices]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Galbert-Buis-CPOJ-2024-Exploring-factors-for-prescription-and-validation-of-actuated-upper-limb-devices.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo
Download (573kB)| Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Actuated devices can be beneficial for individuals with upper limb muscle weakness, offering e xtra force and grip. Utilising this type of assistive device can facilitate daily activities, thereby enhancing independence and overall quality of life. The development of actuated assistive devices has been g rowing, and current literature shows promise in their clinical use. However, they are not yet medically recommended by global guidelines and councils. Studies have suggested why assistive devices have barriers to access, but actuated devices have not been a focus in these discussions. OBJECTIVE(S): To address this issue, a survey was conducted among professionals who prescribe and assess upper limb assistive devices. The survey aimed to gather their opinions and quantify the factors that might contribute to the limited use of actuated devices in the field. METHODOLOGY: A web-based cross-sectional study was designed using Qualtrics, contained 25items and was conducted between October 2023 and January 2024. The survey was piloted, validated, and ethically approved. Results were statistically analysed, and open questions underwent thematic analysis. FINDINGS: 87 Allied Health Professionals (AHPs) contributed to the survey, with a completion rate of 69% (60/87). Survey respondents predominately worked from the USA (72%). The survey revealed that 66% of respondents felt they did not have sufficient access to assistive devices and 58% indicated that outcome measures could be improved. They also noted that actuated devices needed to better meet user-centric needs. Barriers to prescribing these devices included a lack of awareness, experience and standardised prescription methods. In addition, the limited time with patients made decision-making and validation of an actuated device difficult. CONCLUSION: AHP’s have experience prescribing assistive devices but do not have access, knowledge, or clinical methods to assess the use of actuated devices. Future designs for actuated devices should focus on wearability, comfort, user satisfaction, safety and ease of use.

ORCID iDs

Galbert, Angel ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1180-5691 and Buis, Arjan ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3947-293X;
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)