In defence of contextually sensitive moral activism
Nicolson, Donald (2004) In defence of contextually sensitive moral activism. Legal Ethics, 7 (2). pp. 269-275. ISSN 1460-728X
Full text not available in this repository.Request a copy from the Strathclyde authorOfficial URL: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/hart/legeth/...
Abstract
Argues that there is no blanket justification for lawyers acting as neutral partisans. Instead, depending on the particular practice context and all the unique circumstances of each individual case, lawyers may be justified in refusing to represent particular individuals or (after moral dialogue) to do everything legal and not prohibited by professional rules for them.
| Creators(s): |
Nicolson, Donald  ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3404-8793;
| Item type: | Article |
|---|---|
| ID code: | 914 |
| Keywords: | legal ethics, discrimation, legal system, Law (General) |
| Subjects: | Law > Law (General) |
| Department: | Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences (HaSS) > School of Law > Law |
| Depositing user: | Miss Jacqueline Miller |
| Date deposited: | 02 May 2006 |
| Last modified: | 01 Jan 2021 08:08 |
| URI: | https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/914 |
| Export data: |
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)