Constraining the twilight zone remineralization in the South China Sea basin : insights from the multi-method intercomparison

Tools

Xu, Chao and Xiang, Mingwang and Chen, Bingzhang and Huang, Yibin and Qiu, Guoqiang and Zhang, Yuchen and Wang, Haili and Huang, Bangqin (2024) Constraining the twilight zone remineralization in the South China Sea basin : insights from the multi-method intercomparison. Progress in Oceanography, 228. 103316. ISSN 0079-6611 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2024.103316)

[thumbnail of Xu-etal-PO-2024-Constraining-the-twilight-zone-remineralization-in-the-South-China-Sea-basin] Text. Filename: Xu-etal-PO-2024-Constraining-the-twilight-zone-remineralization-in-the-South-China-Sea-basin.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 25 July 2025.
License: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 logo
Download (1MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

The twilight zone remineralization (TZR) consumes over 70 % of organic carbon exported from the sunlit ocean, significantly affecting oceanic carbon sequestration and atmospheric CO2 concentration. Despite the well-established importance, the quantification of TZR remains challenging, as reflected by conspicuous methodological discrepancy and the unsolved imbalance between carbon supply from the upper layer and demand at depth. Here we combined three independent approaches, including biogeochemical profiling floats (BGC-float) observation, in vivo reduction of the tetrazolium salt by the cellular electron transport system (in vivo INT), and the synthesis of prokaryotic respiration (PR) determined by radiolabeled leucine incorporation and zooplankton respiration (ZR) empirically estimated from the biomass (PR + ZR), to investigate the TZR in the South China Sea basin. Our results show that the BGC-float and PR + ZR approaches gave more consistent results, with the respective values of 5.1 ± 0.5 and 6.4 ± 3.0 mol C m−2 yr−1. However, in vivo INT approach yielded a TZR nearly an order of magnitude higher at 30.0 ± 6.1 mol C m−2 yr−1. To further reconcile methodological discrepancies, we estimated the possible range of carbon supply by integrating comprehensive carbon sources, including sinking particles, dissolved organic carbon input, lateral transport, dark carbon fixation, and active carbon transport by zooplankton migration. After considering multiple carbon sources, we successfully balanced the carbon demand as indicated by BGC-float and PR + ZR approaches. Our intercomparison exercise suggests a potential overestimation of TZR by the in vivo INT approach, and also highlights the importance of integrating multiple carbon sources in closing the twilight zone carbon budget.

ORCID iDs

Xu, Chao, Xiang, Mingwang, Chen, Bingzhang ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1573-7473, Huang, Yibin, Qiu, Guoqiang, Zhang, Yuchen, Wang, Haili and Huang, Bangqin;
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)