Users' perceptions of access to and quality of Unified Health System services in Brazil : a cross-sectional study and implications to healthcare management challenges

Tools

Souza, Jhoyce S. and Reis, Edna A. and Godman, Brian and Campbell, Stephen M. and Meyer, Johanna C. and Sena, Luann W. P. and Godói, Isabella P. D. (2024) Users' perceptions of access to and quality of Unified Health System services in Brazil : a cross-sectional study and implications to healthcare management challenges. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21 (6). 721. ISSN 1660-4601 (https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21060721)

[thumbnail of Souza-etal-IJERPH-2024-Users-perceptions-of-access-to-and-quality-of-SUS-services-in-Brazil]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Souza-etal-IJERPH-2024-Users-perceptions-of-access-to-and-quality-of-SUS-services-in-Brazil.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo
Download (695kB)| Preview

Abstract

Evaluating the access to and quality of healthcare services from the users’ perspective is an important assessment process to identify priorities. This study assessed the profile of health service usage and the views of the Unified Health System (SUS) users about the access to and quality of SUS public health services. A cross-sectional study was conducted with participants from the Coastal Lowlands Region of the Rio de Janeiro State/Brazil, between August and November 2023. The association between categorical variables was analyzed using the Pearson Chi-Square test, using R software 4.3. A total of 200 individuals were interviewed using a 66-question survey instrument. Participants who reported using SUS services more frequently rated this system as essential (p-value = 0.031). However, overall, 64% of participants rated the quality of care to be very bad/bad and 34.9% rated access as very bad/bad. Access was considered poor by respondents who used public services rarely or sometimes (p-value = 0.002). In terms of accessing SUS services consultations provided by specialists (e.g., neurologists), these were available only in another municipality (p-value = 0.001). Many participants were SUS dependent for health services, and gaps and weaknesses were observed regarding users’ perspectives of the access to and quality of SUS health care. Policymakers should prioritize evaluations and dialogue with the community to make SUS services responsive and to optimize value-for-money in health service planning.

CORE (COnnecting REpositories)