Patient-reported outcome measures in neuromuscular diseases : a scoping review

Tools

Voet, Nicole and Pater, Ronne and Zaldua, Joana Garmendia and Sistiaga, Andone and Labayru, Garazi and Gallais, Benjamin and de Groot, Ingrid and Muslemani, Samar and Gagnon, Cynthia and Graham, Christopher (2024) Patient-reported outcome measures in neuromuscular diseases : a scoping review. Neuromuscular Disorders, 11 (3). pp. 567-577. ISSN 1873-2364 (https://doi.org/10.3233/JND-240003)

[thumbnail of Patient-reported outcome measures in neuromuscular diseases]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Patient-reported_outcome_measures_in_neuromuscular_diseases.pdf
License: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 logo
Download (774kB)| Preview

Abstract

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are valuable in comprehensively understanding patients' health experiences and informing healthcare decisions in research and clinical care without clinicians' input. Until now, no central resource containing information on all PROMS in neuromuscular diseases (NMD) is available, hindering the comparison and choice of PROMs used to monitor NMDs and appropriately reflect the patient’s voice. This scoping review aimed to present a comprehensive assessment of the existing literature on using PROMs in children and adults with NMD. A scoping methodology was followed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines to assess the literature on PROMs in NMDs. Eligibility criteria encompassed articles describing psychometric development or evaluation of generic or disease-specific PROM-based instruments for adults and children with specific NMDs. The data charting process involved extracting measurement properties of included PROMs, comprising validity, reliability, responsiveness, and interpretability information. The review identified 190 PROMs evaluated across 247 studies in individuals with NMDs. The majority of PROMs were disease specific. The physical functioning domain was most assessed. Validity was the most frequently investigated measurement property, with a limited number of PROMs sufficiently evaluated for a range of psychometric characteristics. There is a strong need for further research on the responsiveness and interpretability of PROMs and the development of PROMs on social functioning in NMD.

ORCID iDs

Voet, Nicole, Pater, Ronne, Zaldua, Joana Garmendia, Sistiaga, Andone, Labayru, Garazi, Gallais, Benjamin, de Groot, Ingrid, Muslemani, Samar, Gagnon, Cynthia and Graham, Christopher ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8456-9154;
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)