Ranking heterogeneous search result pages using the interactive Probability Ranking Principle

Pathak, Kanaad and Azzopardi, Leif and Halvey, Martin (2024) Ranking heterogeneous search result pages using the interactive Probability Ranking Principle. Other. arXiv.org, Ithaca, NY.

[thumbnail of Pathak-etal-arXiv-2024-Ranking-heterogeneous-search-result-pages-using-the-interactive-probability-ranking-principle]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Pathak-etal-arXiv-2024-Ranking-heterogeneous-search-result-pages-using-the-interactive-probability-ranking-principle.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons ShareAlike 4.0 logo
Download (4MB)| Preview

Abstract

The Probability Ranking Principle (PRP) ranks search results based on their expected utility derived solely from document contents, often overlooking the nuances of presentation and user interaction. However, with the evolution of Search Engine Result Pages (SERPs), now comprising a variety of result cards, the manner in which these results are presented is pivotal in influencing user engagement and satisfaction. This shift prompts the question: How does the PRP and its user-centric counterpart, the Interactive Probability Ranking Principle (iPRP), compare in the context of these heterogeneous SERPs? Our study draws a comparison between the PRP and the iPRP, revealing significant differences in their output. The iPRP, accounting for item-specific costs and interaction probabilities to determine the ``Expected Perceived Utility" (EPU), yields different result orderings compared to the PRP. We evaluate the effect of the EPU on the ordering of results by observing changes in the ranking within a heterogeneous SERP compared to the traditional ``ten blue links''. We find that changing the presentation affects the ranking of items according to the (iPRP) by up to 48\% (with respect to DCG, TBG and RBO) in ad-hoc search tasks on the TREC WaPo Collection. This work suggests that the iPRP should be employed when ranking heterogeneous SERPs to provide a user-centric ranking that adapts the ordering based on the presentation and user engagement.

CORE (COnnecting REpositories)