Use of accelerometers to track changes in stepping behavior with the introduction of the 2020 COVID pandemic restrictions : a case study

Tools

McGuire, Tiereny and Devin, Kirstie and Patricks, Victoria and Griffiths, Benjamin and Speirs, Craig and Granat, Malcolm (2023) Use of accelerometers to track changes in stepping behavior with the introduction of the 2020 COVID pandemic restrictions : a case study. Journal for the Measurement of Physical Behaviour, 6 (1). pp. 45-59. ISSN 2575-6613 (https://doi.org/10.1123/jmpb.2022-0015)

[thumbnail of McGuire-etal-JMPB-2023-Use-of-accelerometers-to-track-changes-in-stepping]
Preview
 Text. Filename: McGuire-etal-JMPB-2023-Use-of-accelerometers-to-track-changes-in-stepping.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript
License: Strathprints license 1.0
Download (2MB)| Preview

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 lockdown introduced restrictions to free-living activities. Changes to these activities can be accurately quantified using combined measurement. Using activPAL3 and self-reports to collect activity data, the study aimed to quantify changes that occurred in physical activity and sedentary behavior between prelockdown and lockdown. The study also sought to determine changes in indoor and outdoor stepping. Methods: Using activPAL3, four participants recorded physical activity data prelockdown and during lockdown restrictions (February–June 2020). Single events (sitting, standing, stepping, lying) were recorded and analyzed by the CREA algorithm using an event-based approach. The analysis focused on step count, sedentary time, and lying (in bed) time; median and interquartile range were calculated. Daily steps classified as taking place indoors and outdoors were calculated separately. Results: 33 prelockdown and 92 in-lockdown days of valid data were captured. Median daily step count across all participants reduced by 14.8% (from 5,828 prelockdown to 4,963 in-lockdown), while sedentary and lying time increased by 4% and 8%, respectively (sedentary: 9.98–10.30 hr; lying: 9.33–10.05 hr). Individual variations were observed in hours spent sedentary (001: 8.44–8.66, 002: 7.41–8.66, 003: 11.97–10.59, 004: 6.29–7.94, and lying (001: 9.69–9.49, 002: 11.46–11.66, 003: 7.63–9.34, 004: 9.7–11.12) pre- and in-lockdown. Discrepancies in self-report versus algorithm classification of indoor/outdoor stepping were observed for three participants. Conclusion: The study quantitively showed lockdown restrictions negatively impacted physical activity and sedentary behavior; two variables closely linked to health outcomes. This has important implications for public health policies to help develop targeted interventions and mandates that encourage additional physical activity and lower sedentary behavior.

CORE (COnnecting REpositories)