Procedural legitimacy logics within the digital welfare state
Halliday, Simon and Meers, Jed and Tomlinson, Joe (2024) Procedural legitimacy logics within the digital welfare state. Journal of Social Security Law, 31 (1). ISSN 1354-7747
Text.
Filename: Halliday-etal-JSSL-2024-Procedural-legitimacy-logics-within-the-digital-welfare-state.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript Restricted to Repository staff only until 8 March 2025. License: Download (828kB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
One of the most profound shifts seen in governments around the world in recent years is the emergence of the digital welfare state. This transformation has seen the welfare state increasingly dependent on digitalised, automated, and data-driven forms of public administration, which are altering the nature of welfare provision itself. This transition raises a fundamental question: what does a legitimate process look like in this new welfare state? Using new qualitative datasets, this article explores how public officials, welfare claimants, and welfare rights advisors reason about the processes of the UK’s flagship social security programme, Universal Credit (‘UC’)—one of the most prominent digital welfare systems anywhere in the world. It shows that, while the new era of digital welfare is characterised by a paradigmatic, shared intention to make processes work for claimants, the logic of what constitutes an acceptable process for claimants diverges in important ways between officials, advisors and claimants. We characterise these respective logics as ‘UC as a service’, ‘UC as an entitlement’, and ‘UC as a relationship’. Our purpose is not to claim one of these logics is superior per se but that a greater appreciation of them, the perspectives from which they derive, and where and how they differ, can shed valuable light on emerging tensions within and disagreements about the digital welfare state.
ORCID iDs
Halliday, Simon ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5107-6783, Meers, Jed and Tomlinson, Joe;-
-
Item type: Article ID code: 87759 Dates: DateEvent8 March 2024Published9 January 2024AcceptedNotes: This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in the Journal of Social Security Law following peer review. The definitive published version (Halliday, S, Meers, J & Tomlinson, J 2024, 'Procedural legitimacy logics within the digital welfare state', Journal of Social Security Law, vol. 31, no. 1) is available online on Westlaw UK. Subjects: Social Sciences > Social pathology. Social and public welfare
Social Sciences > Public FinanceDepartment: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences (HaSS) > Strathclyde Law School > Law Depositing user: Pure Administrator Date deposited: 10 Jan 2024 09:58 Last modified: 11 Nov 2024 14:10 URI: https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/87759