A robust Bayesian approach for causal inference problems

Tools

Basu, Tathagata and Troffaes, Matthias C.M. and Einbeck, Jochen; Bouraoui, Zied and Vesic, Srdjan, eds. (2023) A robust Bayesian approach for causal inference problems. In: Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence . Springer, Cham, 359–371. ISBN 9783031456084 (https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45608-4_27)

[thumbnail of Basu-etal-ECSQARU-2023-A-robust-Bayesian-approach-for-causal-inference-problems]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Basu-etal-ECSQARU-2023-A-robust-Bayesian-approach-for-causal-inference-problems.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript
License: Strathprints license 1.0
Download (1MB)| Preview

Abstract

Causal inference concerns finding the treatment effect on subjects along with causal links between the variables and the outcome. However, the underlying heterogeneity between subjects makes the problem practically unsolvable. Additionally, we often need to find a subset of explanatory variables to understand the treatment effect. Currently, variable selection methods tend to maximise the predictive performance of the underlying model, and unfortunately, under limited data, the predictive performance is hard to assess, leading to harmful consequences. To address these issues, in this paper, we consider a robust Bayesian analysis which accounts for abstention in selecting explanatory variables in the high dimensional regression model. To achieve that, we consider a set of spike and slab priors through prior elicitation to obtain a set of posteriors for both the treatment and outcome model. We are specifically interested in the sensitivity of the treatment effect in high dimensional causal inference as well as identifying confounder variables. However, confounder selection can be deceptive in this setting, especially when a predictor is strongly associated with either the treatment or the outcome. To avoid that we apply a post-hoc selection scheme, attaining a smaller set of confounders as well as separate sets of variables which are only related to treatment or outcome model. Finally, we illustrate our method to show its applicability.

ORCID iDs

Basu, Tathagata ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6851-154X, Troffaes, Matthias C.M. and Einbeck, Jochen; Bouraoui, Zied and Vesic, Srdjan
  • Item type:Book Section
    ID code:87535
    Dates:
    Date
    Event
    19 November 2023
    Published
    1 July 2023
    Accepted
    Notes:Copyright © 2023 Springer-Verlag. This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45608-4_27.
    Subjects:Science > Mathematics > Probabilities. Mathematical statistics
    Department:Faculty of Engineering > Civil and Environmental Engineering
    Depositing user: Pure Administrator
    Date deposited:07 Dec 2023 10:29
    Last modified:20 Nov 2024 01:40
    URI:https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/87535
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)