Automated vessel segmentation using infinite perimeter active contour model with hybrid region information with application to retinal images

Zhao, Yitian and Rada, Lavdie and Chen, Ke and Harding, Simon P. and Zheng, Yalin (2015) Automated vessel segmentation using infinite perimeter active contour model with hybrid region information with application to retinal images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 34 (9). pp. 1797-1807. ISSN 0278-0062 (https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2015.2409024)

[thumbnail of Zhao-etal-IEEE-TMI-2015-Automated-vessel-segmentation-using-infinite-perimeter-active-contour-model]
Preview
Text. Filename: Zhao-etal-IEEE-TMI-2015-Automated-vessel-segmentation-using-infinite-perimeter-active-contour-model.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo

Download (2MB)| Preview

Abstract

Automated detection of blood vessel structures is becoming of crucial interest for better management of vascular disease. In this paper, we propose a new infinite active contour model that uses hybrid region information of the image to approach this problem. More specifically, an infinite perimeter regularizer, provided by using L2 Lebesgue measure of the γ -neighborhood of boundaries, allows for better detection of small oscillatory (branching) structures than the traditional models based on the length of a feature's boundaries (i.e., H1 Hausdorff measure). Moreover, for better general segmentation performance, the proposed model takes the advantage of using different types of region information, such as the combination of intensity information and local phase based enhancement map. The local phase based enhancement map is used for its superiority in preserving vessel edges while the given image intensity information will guarantee a correct feature's segmentation. We evaluate the performance of the proposed model by applying it to three public retinal image datasets (two datasets of color fundus photography and one fluorescein angiography dataset). The proposed model outperforms its competitors when compared with other widely used unsupervised and supervised methods. For example, the sensitivity (0.742), specificity (0.982) and accuracy (0.954) achieved on the DRIVE dataset are very close to those of the second observer's annotations.

ORCID iDs

Zhao, Yitian, Rada, Lavdie, Chen, Ke ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6093-6623, Harding, Simon P. and Zheng, Yalin;