Understanding primary care transformation and implications for ageing populations and health inequalities : a systematic scoping review of new models of primary health care in OECD countries and China

Tools

Henderson, D. A. G and Donaghy, E and Dozier, M and Guthrie, B and Huang, H and Pickersgill, M and Stewart, E and Thompson, A and Wang, H. H. X and Mercer, S. W (2023) Understanding primary care transformation and implications for ageing populations and health inequalities : a systematic scoping review of new models of primary health care in OECD countries and China. BMC Medicine, 21. 319. ISSN 1741-7015 (https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-023-03033-z)

[thumbnail of Henderson-etal-BMCM-2023-Understanding-primary-care-transformation-and-implications-for-ageing-populations]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Henderson_etal_BMCM_2023_Understanding_primary_care_transformation_and_implications_for_ageing_populations.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo
Download (1MB)| Preview

Abstract

Background: Many countries have introduced reforms with the aim of primary care transformation (PCT). Common objectives include meeting service delivery challenges associated with ageing populations and health inequalities. To date, there has been little research comparing PCT internationally. Our aim was to examine PCT and new models of primary care by conducting a systematic scoping review of international literature in order to describe major policy changes including key ‘components’, impacts of new models of care, and barriers and facilitators to PCT implementation. Methods: We undertook a systematic scoping review of international literature on PCT in OECD countries and China (published protocol: https://osf.io/2afym). Ovid [MEDLINE/Embase/Global Health], CINAHL Plus, and Global Index Medicus were searched (01/01/10 to 28/08/21). Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts with data extraction by a single reviewer. A narrative synthesis of findings followed. Results: A total of 107 studies from 15 countries were included. The most frequently employed component of PCT was the expansion of multidisciplinary teams (MDT) (46% of studies). The most frequently measured outcome was GP views (27%), with < 20% measuring patient views or satisfaction. Only three studies evaluated the effects of PCT on ageing populations and 34 (32%) on health inequalities with ambiguous results. For the latter, PCT involving increased primary care access showed positive impacts whilst no benefits were reported for other components. Analysis of 41 studies citing barriers or facilitators to PCT implementation identified leadership, change, resources, and targets as key themes. Conclusions: Countries identified in this review have used a range of approaches to PCT with marked heterogeneity in methods of evaluation and mixed findings on impacts. Only a minority of studies described the impacts of PCT on ageing populations, health inequalities, or from the patient perspective. The facilitators and barriers identified may be useful in planning and evaluating future developments in PCT.

ORCID iDs

Henderson, D. A. G, Donaghy, E, Dozier, M, Guthrie, B, Huang, H, Pickersgill, M, Stewart, E ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3013-1477, Thompson, A, Wang, H. H. X and Mercer, S. W;
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)