Using culture sensitivity reports to optimize antimicrobial therapy : findings and implications of antimicrobial stewardship activity in a hospital in Pakistan

Altaf, Ummara and Saleem, Zikria and Akhtar, Muhammad Furqan and Altowayan, Waleed Mohammad and Alqasoumi, Abdulmajeed and Alshammari, Mohammed and Haseeb, Abdul and Raees, Fahad and Imam, Mohammad Tarique and Batool, Narjis and Akhtar, Muhammad Masoom and Godman, Brian (2023) Using culture sensitivity reports to optimize antimicrobial therapy : findings and implications of antimicrobial stewardship activity in a hospital in Pakistan. Medicina, 59 (7). 1237. ISSN 1648-9144 (https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59071237)

[thumbnail of Altaf-etal-Medicina-2023-Using-culture-sensitivity-reports-to-optimize-antimicrobial-therapy]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Altaf_etal_Medicina_2023_Using_culture_sensitivity_reports_to_optimize_antimicrobial_therapy.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo
Download (786kB)| Preview

Abstract

Background: There are concerns with inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics in hospitals especially broad spectrum in Pakistan and the subsequent impact on antimicrobial resistance rates. One recognized way to reduce inappropriate prescribing is for empiric therapy to be adjusted according to the result of culture sensitivity reports. Objective: Using culture sensitivity reports to optimize antibiotic prescribing in a teaching hospital in Pakistan. Methods: A retrospective observational study was undertaken in Ghurki Trust Teaching Hospital. A total of 465 positive cultures were taken from patients during the study period (May 2018 and December 2018). The results of pathogen identification and susceptibility testing from patient-infected sites were assessed. Additional data was collected from the patient’s medical file. This included demographic data, sample type, causative microbe, antimicrobial treatment, and whether empiric or definitive treatment as well as medicine costs. Antimicrobial data was assessed using World Health Organization’s Defined Daily Dose methodology. Results: A total of 497 isolates were detected from the 465 patient samples as 32 patients had polymicrobes, which included 309 g-negative rods and 188 g-positive cocci. Out of 497 isolates, the most common Gram-positive pathogen isolated was Staphylococcus aureus (Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus) (125) (25.1%) and the most common Gram-negative pathogen was Escherichia coli (140) (28.1%). Most of the gram-negative isolates were found to be resistant to ampicillin and co-amoxiclav. Most of the Acinetobacter baumannii isolates were resistant to carbapenems. Gram-positive bacteria showed the maximum sensitivity to linezolid and vancomycin. The most widely used antibiotics for empiric therapy were cefoperazone plus sulbactam, ceftriaxone, amikacin, vancomycin, and metronidazole whereas high use of linezolid, clindamycin, meropenem, and piperacillin + tazobactam was seen in definitive treatment. Empiric therapy was adjusted in 220 (71.1%) cases of Gram-negative infections and 134 (71.2%) cases of Gram-positive infections. Compared with empiric therapy, there was a 13.8% reduction in the number of antibiotics in definitive treatment. The average cost of antibiotics in definitive treatment was less than seen with empiric treatment (8.2%) and the length of hospitalization also decreased. Conclusions: Culture sensitivity reports helped reduced antibiotic utilization and costs as well as helped select the most appropriate treatment. We also found an urgent need for implementing antimicrobial stewardship programs in hospitals and the development of hospital antibiotic guidelines to reduce unnecessary prescribing of broad-spectrum antibiotics.

CORE (COnnecting REpositories)