Improving spatial agreement in machine learning-based landslide susceptibility mapping

Tools

Adnan, Mohammed Sarfaraz Gani and Rahman, Md Salman and Ahmed, Nahian and Ahmed, Bayes and Rabbi, Md Fazleh and Rahman, Rashedur M. (2020) Improving spatial agreement in machine learning-based landslide susceptibility mapping. Remote Sensing, 12 (20). 3347. ISSN 2072-4292 (https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12203347)

[thumbnail of Adnan-etal-RS-2020-Improving-spatial-agreement-in-machine-learning-based-landslide-susceptibility-mapping]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Adnan_etal_RS_2020_Improving_spatial_agreement_in_machine_learning_based_landslide_susceptibility_mapping.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo
Download (13MB)| Preview

Abstract

Despite yielding considerable degrees of accuracy in landslide predictions, the outcomes of different landslide susceptibility models are prone to spatial disagreement; and therefore, uncertainties. Uncertainties in the results of various landslide susceptibility models create challenges in selecting the most suitable method to manage this complex natural phenomenon. This study aimed to propose an approach to reduce uncertainties in landslide prediction, diagnosing spatial agreement in machine learning-based landslide susceptibility maps. It first developed landslide susceptibility maps of Cox’s Bazar district of Bangladesh, applying four machine learning algorithms: K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM), featuring hyperparameter optimization of 12 landslide conditioning factors. The results of all the four models yielded very high prediction accuracy, with the area under the curve (AUC) values range between 0.93 to 0.96. The assessment of spatial agreement of landslide predictions showed that the pixel-wise correlation coefficients of landslide probability between various models range from 0.69 to 0.85, indicating the uncertainty in predicted landslides by various models, despite their considerable prediction accuracy. The uncertainty was addressed by establishing a Logistic Regression (LR) model, incorporating the binary landslide inventory data as the dependent variable and the results of the four landslide susceptibility models as independent variables. The outcomes indicated that the RF model had the highest influence in predicting the observed landslide locations, followed by the MLP, SVM, and KNN models. Finally, a combined landslide susceptibility map was developed by integrating the results of the four machine learning-based landslide predictions. The combined map resulted in better spatial agreement (correlation coefficients range between 0.88 and 0.92) and greater prediction accuracy (0.97) compared to the individual models. The modelling approach followed in this study would be useful in minimizing uncertainties of various methods and improving landslide predictions.

ORCID iDs

Adnan, Mohammed Sarfaraz Gani ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7276-1891, Rahman, Md Salman ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1305-1136, Ahmed, Nahian, Ahmed, Bayes, Rabbi, Md Fazleh and Rahman, Rashedur M.;
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)