Comparison of several prediction equations using skinfold thickness for estimating percentage body fat vs. body fat percentage determined by BIA in 6-8-year-old South African children : The BC-IT Study

Tools

Moeng-Mahlangu, Lynn and Monyeki, Makama A. and Reilly, John J. and Kruger, Herculina S. (2022) Comparison of several prediction equations using skinfold thickness for estimating percentage body fat vs. body fat percentage determined by BIA in 6-8-year-old South African children : The BC-IT Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19 (21). 14531. ISSN 1660-4601 (https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114531)

[thumbnail of Moeng-Mahlangu-etal-IJERPH-2022-Comparison-of-several-prediction-equations-using-skinfold-thickness-for-estimating-percentage-body-fat]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Moeng_Mahlangu_etal_IJERPH_2022_Comparison_of_several_prediction_equations_using_skinfold_thickness_for_estimating_percentage_body_fat.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo
Download (957kB)| Preview

Abstract

Body composition measurement is useful for assessing percentage body fat (%BF) and medical diagnosis, monitoring disease progression and response to treatment, and is essential in assessing nutritional status, especially in children. However, finding accurate and precise techniques remains a challenge. The study compares %BF determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and calculated from available prediction equations based on skinfolds in young South African children. A cross-sectional study performed on 202 children (83 boys and 119 girls) aged 6–8 years. Height and weight, triceps and subscapular skinfolds were determined according to standard procedures. %BF was determined with BIA and three relevant available equations. SPSS analyzed the data using paired samples tests, linear regression, and Bland–Altman plots. Significant paired mean differences were found for BIA and Slaughter (t 201 = 33.896, p < 0.001), Wickramasinghe (t 201 = 4.217, p < 0.001), and Dezenberg (t 201 = 19.910, p < 0.001). For all of the equations, the standards for evaluating prediction errors (SEE) were above 5. The Bland–Altman plots show relatively large positive and negative deviations from the mean difference lines and trends of systematic under- and over-estimation of %BF across the %BF spectrum. All three equations demonstrated a smaller %BF than the %BF measured by BIA, but the difference was smallest with the Wickramasinghe equation. In comparison, a poor SEE was found in the three %BF predicted equations and %BF derived from BIA. As such, an age-specific %BF equation incorporating criterion methods of deuterium dilution techniques or ‘gold-standard’ methods is needed to refute these findings. However, in the absence of developed %BF equations or 'gold-standard' methods, the available prediction equations are still desirable.

ORCID iDs

Moeng-Mahlangu, Lynn, Monyeki, Makama A., Reilly, John J. ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6165-5471 and Kruger, Herculina S.;
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)