Picture of UK Houses of Parliament

Leading national thinking on politics, government & public policy through Open Access research

Strathprints makes available scholarly Open Access content by researchers in the School of Government & Public Policy, based within the Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences.

Research here is 1st in Scotland for research intensity and spans a wide range of domains. The Department of Politics demonstrates expertise in understanding parties, elections and public opinion, with additional emphases on political economy, institutions and international relations. This international angle is reflected in the European Policies Research Centre (EPRC) which conducts comparative research on public policy. Meanwhile, the Centre for Energy Policy provides independent expertise on energy, working across multidisciplinary groups to shape policy for a low carbon economy.

Explore the Open Access research of the School of Government & Public Policy. Or explore all of Strathclyde's Open Access research...

Assessment of the risk of systemic fat mobilization and fat embolism as a consequence of liposuction: ex vivo study

El-Ali, K.M. and Gourlay, T. (2006) Assessment of the risk of systemic fat mobilization and fat embolism as a consequence of liposuction: ex vivo study. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 117 (7). pp. 2269-2276. ISSN 0032-1052

Full text not available in this repository.Request a copy from the Strathclyde author


Adverse consequences of liposuction, including those associated with fat embolism, have been reported in the literature. Fat embolism syndrome after liposuction may be underestimated because of the unspecific nature of the symptoms. The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a generic risk of the generation of intravascular fat emboli as a consequence of liposuction. An animal study was conducted in which liposuction was performed on 10 Sprague-Dawley rats. The procedure was conducted with the animals under general anesthesia for 60 minutes, in a similar manner to that practiced clinically. Three blood samples were taken from each animal through a central line (one before liposuction and two at 30 and 60 minutes into liposuction) and examined for the presence of fat particles. The animals were then euthanized and the lungs and brain were removed for histological examination. In the control group, liposuction was not performed, but similar blood and histological samples were taken. In the study group, stained fat particles were seen in all blood samples taken during liposuction but not in those taken before liposuction. The difference between the 30- and 60-minute samples and the preliposuction control ones was statistically significant (p < 0.001 minimum). The differences between the 30-minute and 60-minute samples were also statistically significant (p = 0.017), demonstrating that fat mobilization during liposuction is a cumulative process. Nothing of significance was seen in the blood samples of the control group. Lipid deposits were seen in the lungs of all study group animals but not in the control group. With one possible exception, no lipid deposits were confirmed in brain specimens. The authors' experiments have demonstrated a significant risk of systemic fat mobilization and fat embolism after liposuction in the animal model. Further clinical investigation is required to evaluate the real clinical risk of this procedure from this perspective.