The mouse and the snail : reappraising the significance of Donoghue v Stevenson part I - a case worth celebrating?

Tools

Brown, Jonathan (2022) The mouse and the snail : reappraising the significance of Donoghue v Stevenson part I - a case worth celebrating? Scots Law Times, 2022 (35). pp. 229-234. ISSN 0036-908X

[thumbnail of Brown-SLT-2022-The-mouse-and-the-snail-part-I]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Brown_SLT_2022_The_mouse_and_the_snail_part_I.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript
License: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 logo
Download (647kB)| Preview

Abstract

First in a four-part series. Questions the extent to which Scots lawyers should 'revel' in the fame of the case of Donoghue v Stevenson 1932 SC (HL) 31 in light of the fact that Scotland is not itself a Common law jurisdiction. Discusses the difficulties with the idea - taken as an article of faith in the case itself - that 'there [was] no speciality of Scots law involved and that the case [could] safely be decided on principles common to both systems [i.e., Scots and English law]' and considers the dangers that adopting the 'incremental approach' favoured in English jurisprudence would have in respect of the 'intellectual superstructure' of Scots delict.

ORCID iDs

Brown, Jonathan ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9198-9672;
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)