Invited perspectives : challenges and future directions in improving bridge flood resilience

Tools

Tubaldi, Enrico and White, Christopher J. and Patelli, Edoardo and Mitoulis, Stergios Aristoteles and de Almeida, Gustavo and Brown, Jim and Cranston, Michael and Hardman, Martin and Koursari, Eftychia and Lamb, Rob and McDonald, Hazel and Mathews, Richard and Newell, Richard and Pizarro, Alonso and Roca, Marta and Zonta, Daniele (2022) Invited perspectives : challenges and future directions in improving bridge flood resilience. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 22 (3). 795–812. ISSN 1684-9981 (https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2021-293)

[thumbnail of Tubaldi-etal-NHESS-2022-Invited-perspectives-challenges-and-future-directions-in-improving-bridge-flood-resilience]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Tubaldi_etal_NHESS_2022_Invited_perspectives_challenges_and_future_directions_in_improving_bridge_flood_resilience.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo
Download (1MB)| Preview

Abstract

Bridges are critical infrastructure components of road and rail transport networks. A large number of these critical assets cross or are adjacent to waterways and floodplains and are therefore exposed to flood actions such as scour, hydrodynamic loading and inundation, all of which are exacerbated by debris accumulations. These stressors are widely recognised as responsible for the vast majority of bridge failures around the world. While efforts have been made to increase the robustness of bridges to the flood hazard, many scientific and technical gaps remain. These gaps were explored during an expert workshop that took place in April 2021 with the participation of academics, consultants and decision makers operating in the United Kingdom and specialised in the fields of bridge risk assessment and management and floods. In particular, the following issues, established at different levels and scales of bridge flood resilience, were analysed: (i) characterization of the effects of floods on different bridge typologies, (ii) inaccuracy of formulae for scour depth assessment, (iii) evaluation of consequences of damage, (iv) recovery process after flood damage, (v) decision-making under uncertainty, and (vi) use of event forecasting and monitoring data for increasing the reliability of bridge flood risk estimations. These issues are discussed in this paper to inform other researchers and stakeholders worldwide, guide the directions of future research in the field, and influence policies for risk mitigation and rapid response to flood warnings, ultimately increasing bridge resilience.

ORCID iDs

Tubaldi, Enrico, White, Christopher J., Patelli, Edoardo ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5007-7247, Mitoulis, Stergios Aristoteles, de Almeida, Gustavo, Brown, Jim, Cranston, Michael, Hardman, Martin, Koursari, Eftychia, Lamb, Rob, McDonald, Hazel, Mathews, Richard, Newell, Richard, Pizarro, Alonso, Roca, Marta and Zonta, Daniele;
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)