Alternative and augmentative communication technologies for supporting adults with mild intellectual disabilities during clinical consultations : scoping review

Gibson, Ryan Colin and Bouamrane, Matt-Mouley and Dunlop, Mark D (2021) Alternative and augmentative communication technologies for supporting adults with mild intellectual disabilities during clinical consultations : scoping review. JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies, 8 (2). e19925. ISSN 2369-2529 (https://doi.org/10.2196/19925)

[thumbnail of Gibson-etal-RAT-2021-Alternative-and-augmentative-communication-technologies-to-support-adults-with-mild-intellectual-disabilities]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Gibson_etal_RAT_2021_Alternative_and_augmentative_communication_technologies_to_support_adults_with_mild_intellectual_disabilities.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo
Download (548kB)| Preview

Abstract

Background: People with intellectual disabilities (IDs) face significant communication barriers when accessing health care services; they find it difficult to identify and describe conditions clearly enough to support practitioners in making an accurate diagnosis. In addition, medical professionals generally have little knowledge and understanding of the needs of people with ID, which may result in the use of consultation techniques that do not cater to their patients' skills. Objective: This review aims to identify and synthesize the literature on alternative and augmentative communication technologies that are used to support adults with mild ID during the exchange of information with medical practitioners. Methods: We performed a scoping review of studies published in English that describe the technologies that are used to promote communication with patients with mild ID during medical consultations. The databases searched were PubMed, ACM Digital Library, and Google Scholar. A qualitative framework-based approach was used to synthesize the data and discern key recurring themes across the identified literature. Results: Of the 1557 articles screened, 15 (0.96%) met our inclusion criteria. The bulk of the communication aids used focused on low-tech solutions, including patient passports, note-based prompts, Talking Mats, health diaries, and easy-read information sheets. Their influence on current practice ranged from advancing medical professionals' knowledge of the health and communication needs of people with ID to increasing interagency collaboration, patient advocacy skills, and health promotion activities. The major barriers to the implementation of low-tech aids were a lack of portability and increased maintenance efforts. Only 3 studies explored the use of mobile apps to promote communication. Their findings indicated that high-tech solutions offer greater customization with regard to the accessibility and health care needs of people with ID. Conclusions: Alternative and augmentative communication technologies have the potential to increase the quality of care provided to patients with mild ID; however, little work has been carried out in this area. Greater emphasis must be placed on (high-tech) two-way communication aids that empower patients to become involved in decisions regarding their care. Quantitative evaluation methods should be used to discern the true benefits of such aids, and researchers should describe their study protocols in depth to promote replication and generalizability.

CORE (COnnecting REpositories)