Cluster randomised trials of prescribing policy : an ethical approach to generating drug safety evidence? A discussion of the ethical application of a new research method

Tools

Rogers, Amy and Craig, Gillian and Flynn, Angela and MacKenzie, Isla and MacDonald, Thomas and Doney, Alexander (2020) Cluster randomised trials of prescribing policy : an ethical approach to generating drug safety evidence? A discussion of the ethical application of a new research method. Trials, 21 (1). 477. ISSN 1745-6215 (https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04357-4)

[thumbnail of Rogers-etal-Trials-2020-Cluster-randomised-trials-of-prescribing-policy-an-ethical-approach-to-generating]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Rogers_etal_Trials_2020_Cluster_randomised_trials_of_prescribing_policy_an_ethical_approach_to_generating.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo
Download (508kB)| Preview

Abstract

For most chronic medical conditions, multiple medications are available and prescribers often have limited evidence about which therapy is likely to be the most effective and safe for an individual patient. As many patients are exposed every day to medicines that may be less effective than available alternatives, this is of public health importance. Cluster randomised trials of prescribing policy offer an opportunity to rapidly obtain evidence of comparative effectiveness and safety. These trials can pose a low risk to patients and cause minimal disruption to usual care. Despite the potential scientific value of this approach, there remain valid concerns about consent, medication switching and the use of routinely collected data in research. We discuss these concerns with reference to an ongoing pilot study (Evaluating Diuretics in Normal Care (EVIDENCE) - a cluster randomised evaluation of hypertension prescribing policy, ISRCTN 46635087, registered 11 August 2017).

CORE (COnnecting REpositories)