Issues in establishing blame in disrupted projects
Eden, Colin and Howick, Susan (2020) Issues in establishing blame in disrupted projects. Construction Law Journal, 36 (2). pp. 103-117.
Preview |
Text.
Filename: Eden_Howick_CLJ2019_Issues_in_establishing_blame_in_disrupted_projects.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript Download (679kB)| Preview |
Abstract
Projects subjected to significant cost overruns that occur from disruptions and delays can often result in either the contractor or the employer making a claim against the other party. Claims are for very large sums of money and so the process of establishing blame is a serious matter and can be extremely complex. In this paper we highlight one specific issue - unravelling the interaction between disruptions - that makes establishing blame particularly problematic. Although the issue has been recognised by academics, guidance for practice has not fully acknowledged. The paper uses a simple example to illustrate the nature and significance of the issue of analysing the impact of one disruption on another. The Society for Construction Law recently launched the 2nd Edition of their Protocol that provides "practical and principled guidance on proportionate measures for dealing with delay and disruption issues that can be applied in relation to all projects, regardless of complexity or scale". The Protocol is likely to be influential in helping deal with disputes. However the Protocol provides guidance, particularly in relation to simulation modelling, that means it is likely that mis-attribution of blame will occur. We suggest a revised wording that might alleviate this concern.
ORCID iDs
Eden, Colin and Howick, Susan ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0796-7981;-
-
Item type: Article ID code: 70337 Dates: DateEvent1 January 2020Published28 September 2019AcceptedNotes: This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Construction Law Journal. The definitive published version Eden, Colin ; Howick, Susan. / Issues in establishing blame in disrupted projects. In: Construction Law Journal. 2019 ; pp. 1-27. is available online on Westlaw UK or from Thomson Reuters DocDel service . Subjects: Technology > Building construction
Social Sciences > Industries. Land use. Labor > Management. Industrial ManagementDepartment: Strathclyde Business School > Management Science Depositing user: Pure Administrator Date deposited: 29 Oct 2019 10:46 Last modified: 20 Dec 2024 01:46 URI: https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/70337