Demonstrating developments in high-fidelity analytical radiation force modelling methods for spacecraft with a new model for GPS IIR/IIR-M

Bhattarai, S. and Ziebart, M. and Allgeier, S. and Grey, S. and Springer, T. and Harrison, D. and Li, Z. (2019) Demonstrating developments in high-fidelity analytical radiation force modelling methods for spacecraft with a new model for GPS IIR/IIR-M. Journal of Geodesy, 93 (9). pp. 1515-1528. ISSN 0949-7714 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-019-01265-7)

[thumbnail of Bhattarai-etal-JOG-2019-Demonstrating-developments-in-high-fidelity-analytical-radiation-force]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Bhattarai_etal_JOG_2019_Demonstrating_developments_in_high_fidelity_analytical_radiation_force.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo
Download (966kB)| Preview

Abstract

This paper presents recently developed strategies for high-fidelity, analytical radiation force modelling for spacecraft. The performance of these modelling strategies is assessed using a new model for the Global Positioning System Block IIR and IIR-M spacecraft. The statistics of various orbit model parameters in a full orbit estimation process that uses tracking data from 100 stations are examined. Over the full year of 2016, considering all Block IIR and IIR-M satellites on orbit, introducing University College London’s grid-based model into the orbit determination process reduces mean 3-d orbit overlap values by 9% and the noise about the mean orbit overlap value by 4%, when comparing against orbits estimated using a simpler box-wing model of the spacecraft. Comparing with orbits produced using the extended Empirical CODE Orbit Model, we see decreases of 4% and 3% in the mean and the noise about the mean of the 3-d orbit overlap statistics, respectively. In orbit predictions over 14-day intervals, over the first day, we see smaller root-mean-square errors in the along-track and cross-track directions, but slightly larger errors in the radial direction. Over the 14th day, we see smaller errors in the radial and cross-track directions, but slightly larger errors in the along-track direction.

ORCID iDs

Bhattarai, S., Ziebart, M., Allgeier, S., Grey, S. ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9274-0601, Springer, T., Harrison, D. and Li, Z.;
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)