Dose-response between frequency of breaks in sedentary time and glucose control in type 2 diabetes : a proof of concept study

Paing, Aye C. and McMillan, Kathryn A. and Kirk, Alison F. and Collier, Andrew and Hewitt, Allan and Chastin, Sebastien F.M. (2019) Dose-response between frequency of breaks in sedentary time and glucose control in type 2 diabetes : a proof of concept study. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 22 (7). pp. 808-813. ISSN 1878-1861 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2019.01.017)

[thumbnail of Paing-etal-JSMS-2019-Dose-response-between-frequency-of-breaks-in-sedentary-time]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Paing_etal_JSMS_2019_Dose_response_between_frequency_of_breaks_in_sedentary_time.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript
License: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 logo
Download (300kB)| Preview

Abstract

Objectives This study aimed to investigate dose-response between frequency of breaks in sedentary time and glucose control.DesignRandomised three-treatment, two-period balanced incomplete block trial.MethodsTwelve adults with type 2 diabetes (age, 60 ± 11 years; body mass index, 30.2 ± 4.7 kg/m2) participated in two of the following treatment conditions: sitting for 7 h interrupted by 3 min light-intensity walking breaks every (1) 60 min (Condition 1), (2) 30 min (Condition 2), and (3) 15 min (Condition 3). Postprandial glucose incremental area under the curves (iAUCs) and 21-h glucose total area under the curve (AUC) were measured using continuous glucose monitoring. Standardised meals were provided. Results Compared with Condition 1 (6.7 ± 0.8 mmol L−1 × 3.5 h−1), post-breakfast glucose iAUC was reduced for Condition 3 (3.5 ± 0.9 mmol L−1 × 3.5 h−1, p ˂ 0.04). Post-lunch glucose iAUC was lower in Condition 3 (1.3 ± 0.9 mmol L−1 × 3.5 h−1, p ˂ 0.03) and Condition 2 (2.1 ± 0.7 mmol L−1 × 3.5 h−1, p ˂ 0.05) relative to Condition 1 (4.6 ± 0.8 mmol L−1 × 3.5 h−1). Condition 3 (1.0 ± 0.7 mmol L−1 × 3.5 h−1, p = 0.02) and Condition 2 (1.6 ± 0.6 mmol L−1 × 3.5 h−1, p ˂ 0.04) attenuated post-dinner glucose iAUC compared with Condition 1 (4.0 ± 0.7 mmol L−1 × 3.5 h−1). Cumulative 10.5-h postprandial glucose iAUC was lower in Condition 3 than Condition 1 (p = 0.02). Condition 3 reduced 21-h glucose AUC compared with Condition 1 (p < 0.001) and Condition 2 (p = 0.002). However, post-breakfast glucose iAUC, cumulative 10.5-h postprandial glucose iAUC and 21-h glucose AUC were not different between Condition 2 and Condition 1 (p ˃ 0.05).Conclusions There could be dose-response between frequency of breaks in sedentary time and glucose. Interrupting sedentary time every 15 min could produce better glucose control.

ORCID iDs

Paing, Aye C., McMillan, Kathryn A. ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5849-9666, Kirk, Alison F. ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6534-3763, Collier, Andrew, Hewitt, Allan ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5688-5069 and Chastin, Sebastien F.M.;
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)