Picture of DNA strand

Pioneering chemical biology & medicinal chemistry through Open Access research...

Strathprints makes available scholarly Open Access content by researchers in the Department of Pure & Applied Chemistry, based within the Faculty of Science.

Research here spans a wide range of topics from analytical chemistry to materials science, and from biological chemistry to theoretical chemistry. The specific work in chemical biology and medicinal chemistry, as an example, encompasses pioneering techniques in synthesis, bioinformatics, nucleic acid chemistry, amino acid chemistry, heterocyclic chemistry, biophysical chemistry and NMR spectroscopy.

Explore the Open Access research of the Department of Pure & Applied Chemistry. Or explore all of Strathclyde's Open Access research...

Governing cooperative approaches under the Paris Agreement

Mehling, Michael (2019) Governing cooperative approaches under the Paris Agreement. Ecology Law Quarterly, 46. ISSN 0046-1121 (In Press)

[img] Text (Mehling-ELQ-2019-Governing-cooperative-approaches-under-the)
Accepted Author Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 3 September 2019.

Download (913kB) | Request a copy from the Strathclyde author


    Parties to the Paris Agreement can engage in voluntary cooperation and use internationally transferred mitigation outcomes towards their national climate pledges. Doing so promises to lower the cost of achieving agreed climate objectives, which, in turn, allows countries to increase their mitigation efforts with given resources. Lower costs do not automatically translate into greater climate ambition, however: transfers that involve questionable mitigation outcomes can effectively increase overall emissions, affirming the need for a sound regulatory framework. As Parties negotiate guidance on the implementation of cooperative approaches under the Paris Agreement, they are therefore considering governance options to secure environmental integrity and address the question of overall climate ambition. But country views are far apart on central questions: of all the issues under negotiation to operationalize the Paris Agreement, cooperative approaches are the only agenda item that has not yet been agreed upon. Drawing on an analytical framework that incorporates economic theory and deliberative jurisprudence, practical case studies, and treaty interpretation, this article maps central positions of actors in the negotiations and evaluates relevant options included in the latest textual proposal. It concludes with a set of recommendations on how operational guidance can balance necessary safeguards for climate ambition with flexibility to contain transaction costs and allow for greater participation.