Biofabrication : a guide to technology and terminology
Moroni, Lorenzo and Boland, Thomas and Burdick, Jason A. and De Maria, Carmelo and Derby, Brian and Forgacs, Gabor and Groll, Jürgen and Li, Qing and Malda, Jos and Mironov, Vladimir A. and Mota, Carlos and Nakamura, Makoto and Shu, Wenmiao and Takeuchi, Shoji and Woodfield, Tim B.F. and Xu, Tao and Yoo, James J. and Vozzi, Giovanni (2017) Biofabrication : a guide to technology and terminology. Trends in Biotechnology. pp. 1-19. ISSN 0167-7799 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.10.015)
Preview |
Text.
Filename: Moroni_etal_TB2017_Biofabrication_a_guide_to_technology_and_terminology.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript Download (25MB)| Preview |
Abstract
Biofabrication holds the potential to generate constructs that more closely recapitulate the complexity and heterogeneity of tissues and organs than do currently available regenerative medicine therapies. Such constructs can be applied for tissue regeneration or as in vitro 3D models. Biofabrication is maturing and growing, and scientists with different backgrounds are joining this field, underscoring the need for unity regarding the use of terminology. We therefore believe that there is a compelling need to clarify the relationship between the different concepts, technologies, and descriptions of biofabrication that are often used interchangeably or inconsistently in the current literature. Our objective is to provide a guide to the terminology for different technologies in the field which may serve as a reference for the biofabrication community. Biofabrication holds great potential in the fields of regenerative medicine and physiological 3D in vitro models by allowing the manufacture of complex tissue constructs with a higher degree of biomimicry to native tissues than do current biomedical solutions.As the number of biofabrication technologies being developed continues to expand, it is of paramount importance to adopt a concerted terminology framework and avoid generalizations.The ratio between the spatial resolution and the timescale of manufacture could be considered as a reliable measure to aid in the selection of an appropriate biofabrication technology for a desired application.
ORCID iDs
Moroni, Lorenzo, Boland, Thomas, Burdick, Jason A., De Maria, Carmelo, Derby, Brian, Forgacs, Gabor, Groll, Jürgen, Li, Qing, Malda, Jos, Mironov, Vladimir A., Mota, Carlos, Nakamura, Makoto, Shu, Wenmiao ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1220-361X, Takeuchi, Shoji, Woodfield, Tim B.F., Xu, Tao, Yoo, James J. and Vozzi, Giovanni;-
-
Item type: Article ID code: 63079 Dates: DateEvent11 November 2017Published11 November 2017Published Online10 November 2017AcceptedSubjects: Technology > Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) > Bioengineering Department: Faculty of Engineering > Biomedical Engineering Depositing user: Pure Administrator Date deposited: 29 Jan 2018 10:53 Last modified: 19 Nov 2024 14:02 Related URLs: URI: https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/63079