Validation of a novel device to measure and provide feedback on sedentary behavior

Gill, Jason M.R. and Hawati, Nabeha S.A. and Maxwell, Douglas J. and Louden, David and Mourselas, Nikos and Bunn, Christopher and Gray, Cindy M. and van der Ploeg, Hidde P. and Hunt, Kate and Martin, Anne and Wyke, Sally and Mutrie, Nanette (2018) Validation of a novel device to measure and provide feedback on sedentary behavior. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 50 (3). pp. 525-532. ISSN 1530-0315 (https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001458)

[thumbnail of Gill-etal-MSSE-2017-Validation-of-a-novel-device-to-measure-and-provide]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Gill_etal_MSSE_2017_Validation_of_a_novel_device_to_measure_and_provide.pdf
Accepted Author Manuscript
Download (389kB)| Preview

Abstract

Purpose: Pedometers, which enable self-monitoring of step counts, are effective in facilitating increases in physical activity. Similar devices which provide real-time feedback on sedentary (sitting) behavior are limited. This study aimed to develop and validate a novel device – the SitFIT – which could accurately measure and provide feedback on sedentary behavior and physical activity. Methods: The SitFIT is a tri-axial accelerometer, developed by PAL Technologies, which is worn in the front trouser pocket. This enables tracking of thigh inclination and therefore differentiation between sitting and upright postures, as well as tracking of step count. It has a display to provide user feedback. To determine the validity of the SitFIT for measuring sedentary behavior and step counts, 21 men, aged 30-65 years, with body mass index 26.6±3.9 kg.m-2 wore a SitFIT in a front trouser pocket and an activPAL accelerometer attached to their thigh for up to seven days. Outputs from the SitFIT were compared with the activPAL, which was assumed to provide gold-standard measurements of sitting and step counts. Results: Mean step counts were ~4% lower with the SitFIT than activPAL, with correlation between the two methods being very high (r=0.98) and no obvious bias from the line of equality (regression line: y=1.0035x+418.35). Mean sedentary time was ~5% higher with the SitFIT than activPAL, correlation between methods was high (r=0.84) and the equation of the regression line was close to the line of equality (y=0.8728x+38.445). Conclusions: The SitFIT has excellent validity for measurement of free-living step counts and sedentary time and therefore addresses a clear need for a device that can be used as a tool to provide feedback on sedentary behavior to facilitate behavior change.

ORCID iDs

Gill, Jason M.R., Hawati, Nabeha S.A., Maxwell, Douglas J., Louden, David, Mourselas, Nikos, Bunn, Christopher, Gray, Cindy M., van der Ploeg, Hidde P., Hunt, Kate, Martin, Anne ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1614-6525, Wyke, Sally and Mutrie, Nanette;
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)