Picture of boy being examining by doctor at a tuberculosis sanatorium

Understanding our future through Open Access research about our past...

Strathprints makes available scholarly Open Access content by researchers in the Centre for the Social History of Health & Healthcare (CSHHH), based within the School of Humanities, and considered Scotland's leading centre for the history of health and medicine.

Research at CSHHH explores the modern world since 1800 in locations as diverse as the UK, Asia, Africa, North America, and Europe. Areas of specialism include contraception and sexuality; family health and medical services; occupational health and medicine; disability; the history of psychiatry; conflict and warfare; and, drugs, pharmaceuticals and intoxicants.

Explore the Open Access research of the Centre for the Social History of Health and Healthcare. Or explore all of Strathclyde's Open Access research...

Image: Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust. Wellcome Collection - CC-BY.

Making the macroeconomic case for CCS?

Turner, Karen and Race, Julia (2017) Making the macroeconomic case for CCS? In: All Energy 2017, 2017-05-10 - 2017-05-11, SECC.

[img]
Preview
Text (Turner-Race-All-Energy-2017-Making-the-macroeconomic-case-for-CSS)
Turner_Race_All_Energy_2017_Making_the_macroeconomic_case_for_CSS.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 logo

Download (512kB) | Preview

Abstract

The UK’s decision to scrap its CCS commercialisation competition brings into sharp focus an urgent need to consider the economic service role of capture, transport and storage activities. In July 2016 a spending review briefing by the National Audit Office noted that, while agreeing with the Department for Energy and Climate Change (DECC) that CCS is required to meet UK carbon targets, “HM Treasury raised concerns about the merits of the carbon capture and storage competition given fiscal constraints”. We consider how some key omissions in the information provided to HM Treasury (HMT) by DECC may have contributed to the decision to cancel the competition, focussing around how the wider economic case was not fully made or communicated in an effective manner. Given that the UK Government seems to retain the belief that CCS is likely to be necessary and play a crucial role in the future energy system and low carbon economy, we argue that it is necessary to quantify solidly grounded scenarios for the role that the capture, transport and storage elements can play in an economic service context.