The S-Cycle performance matrix : supporting comprehensive sustainability performance evaluation of technical systems

Tools

Hay, L. and Duffy, A. H. B. and Whitfield, R. I. (2017) The S-Cycle performance matrix : supporting comprehensive sustainability performance evaluation of technical systems. Systems Engineering, 20 (1). pp. 45-70. ISSN 1520-6858 (https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21378)

[thumbnail of Hay-etal-SE-2017-The-S-Cycle-performance-matrix-supporting-comprehensive-sustainability]
Preview
 Text. Filename: Hay_etal_SE_2017_The_S_Cycle_performance_matrix_supporting_comprehensive_sustainability.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 logo
Download (533kB)| Preview

Abstract

The work reported in this paper consolidates and rationalises disparate evaluation methods in a novel, generic framework to support the selection of comprehensive material/energetic sustainability performance indicators (SPIs) for technical systems. The S-Cycle Performance Matrix (S-CPMatrix) is comprised of 6 generic sustainability goals, 11 SPI archetypes, and 23 corresponding metrics identified from a model of technical system sustainability (the S-Cycle). The matrix was evaluated by interpreting and classifying 324 indicators currently applied to evaluate technical system sustainability performance in the literature, with 94.1% found to be fully classifiable with respect to the matrix following several refinements. The remaining 5.9% suggested additional SPI archetypes and a goal that were not initially identified. The matrix is intended to support decision makers in meeting three criteria for comprehensiveness identified from the literature: (C1) inclusion of indicators measuring performance at all relevant scales; (C2) inclusion of efficiency and effectiveness indicators; and (C3) coverage of all system sustainability goals. It may be applied to different systems in conjunction with different evaluation methods, thereby contributing to more consistent guidance on the selection of comprehensive SPIs for technical systems. In addition to industrial evaluation and comparison with existing evaluation methods, four avenues for future research were identified: (i) use of the S-CPMatrix to support systems comparison/benchmarking; (ii) further investigation of unsupported metrics; (iii) the nature and measurement of contaminants; and (iv) the comprehensiveness of SPI sets currently used in sustainability performance evaluation of technical systems.

ORCID iDs

Hay, L. ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3259-9463, Duffy, A. H. B. ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5661-4314 and Whitfield, R. I. ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1065-0395;
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)