Just Emotions? The need for emotionally-intelligent justice policy

Tata, Cyrus and Jamieson, Fiona (2017) Just Emotions? The need for emotionally-intelligent justice policy. Scottish Justice Matters, 5 (1). pp. 32-33. ISSN 2052-7950

[thumbnail of Tata-Jamieson-SJM-2017-The-need-for-emotionally-intelligent-justice-policy]
Text. Filename: Tata_Jamieson_SJM_2017_The_need_for_emotionally_intelligent_justice_policy.pdf
Final Published Version
License: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 2.5 logo

Download (1MB)| Preview


What are the Obstacles to a Rational Criminal Justice Policy? It is often wondered why we do not have a more rational, evidence-based system of criminal justice. All the evidence points towards a more targeted use of imprisonment, a joined up system of criminal and social justice and improved resourcing for community penalties and community services. Yet a key reason which prevents justice policy from proceeding rationally is the fear of looking ‘soft’ in the eyes of the public. People feel let down and angry about a system which seems uninterested in showing justice to be done, publicly recognising the wrong, encouraging the wrong-doer to to face up to the wrong, and make amends. Is there any way out of this policy quandary? Here we propose that a key public frustration, which drives cynicism and penal populism, lies in the failure of criminal justice to engage, and be seen to engage, in emotionally-intelligent communication. Too often the process appears sterile, lacking emotional meaning and participation. Mention of ‘emotion’ in law sometimes rings alarm bells. Our argument, however, is that emotionally-intelligent communication is not opposed to, but essential to, rational and progressive policy.